Core CC:DA Public Space

Colleagues-

NARDAC has submitted a revision proposal, RSC/NARDAC/2025/1, Proposal on numerals associated with given names.
This parallels MARC Proposal No. 2025-02: Redefining Subfield $b in X00 Fields in the MARC 21 Authority and Bibliographic Formats, discussed at the MARC Advisory Committee meeting in January.

We have an opportunity to comment on this NARDAC proposal, although the time frame is short.

To meet NARDAC's response deadline, please reply to this post with any comments you have about this proposal.  All members of this community (whether CC:DA members or not) are welcome to comment.

DEADLINE: Close of business, March 4, 2025.

As always, I apologize for the short amount of time we have to gather the CC:DA comments.

Kathy

Colleagues-

NARDAC has submitted a revision proposal, RSC/NARDAC/2025/1, Proposal on numerals associated with given names.
This parallels MARC Proposal No. 2025-02: Redefining Subfield $b in X00 Fields in the MARC 21 Authority and Bibliographic Formats, discussed at the MARC Advisory Committee meeting in January.

We have an opportunity to comment on this NARDAC proposal, although the time frame is short.

To meet NARDAC's response deadline, please reply to this post with any comments you have about this proposal.  All members of this community (whether CC:DA members or not) are welcome to comment.

DEADLINE: Close of business, March 4, 2025.

As always, I apologize for the short amount of time we have to gather the CC:DA comments.

Kathy

Colleagues-

NARDAC has submitted a revision proposal, RSC/NARDAC/2025/1, Proposal on numerals associated with given names.
This parallels MARC Proposal No. 2025-02: Redefining Subfield $b in X00 Fields in the MARC 21 Authority and Bibliographic Formats, discussed at the MARC Advisory Committee meeting in January.

We have an opportunity to comment on this NARDAC proposal, although the time frame is short.

To meet NARDAC's response deadline, please reply to this post with any comments you have about this proposal.  All members of this community (whether CC:DA members or not) are welcome to comment.

DEADLINE: Close of business, March 4, 2025.

As always, I apologize for the short amount of time we have to gather the CC:DA comments.

Kathy

I agree that the proposal looks good, and that it would benefit from an additional non-Western example. Switching to my RDA Examples Editor hat, I'm happy to work with NARDAC to add a variety of examples to the Toolkit to illustrate the proposed changes once they're implemented.

Colleagues-

NARDAC has submitted a revision proposal, RSC/NARDAC/2025/1, Proposal on numerals associated with given names.
This parallels MARC Proposal No. 2025-02: Redefining Subfield $b in X00 Fields in the MARC 21 Authority and Bibliographic Formats, discussed at the MARC Advisory Committee meeting in January.

We have an opportunity to comment on this NARDAC proposal, although the time frame is short.

To meet NARDAC's response deadline, please reply to this post with any comments you have about this proposal.  All members of this community (whether CC:DA members or not) are welcome to comment.

DEADLINE: Close of business, March 4, 2025.

As always, I apologize for the short amount of time we have to gather the CC:DA comments.

Kathy

The proposal looks great; it supports the representation of personal names in certain non-Latin scripts effectively. I would be happy to help with examples in Arabic if needed. 

Iman 

I agree that the proposal looks good, and that it would benefit from an additional non-Western example. Switching to my RDA Examples Editor hat, I'm happy to work with NARDAC to add a variety of examples to the Toolkit to illustrate the proposed changes once they're implemented.

Colleagues-

NARDAC has submitted a revision proposal, RSC/NARDAC/2025/1, Proposal on numerals associated with given names.
This parallels MARC Proposal No. 2025-02: Redefining Subfield $b in X00 Fields in the MARC 21 Authority and Bibliographic Formats, discussed at the MARC Advisory Committee meeting in January.

We have an opportunity to comment on this NARDAC proposal, although the time frame is short.

To meet NARDAC's response deadline, please reply to this post with any comments you have about this proposal.  All members of this community (whether CC:DA members or not) are welcome to comment.

DEADLINE: Close of business, March 4, 2025.

As always, I apologize for the short amount of time we have to gather the CC:DA comments.

Kathy

The proposal looks great; it supports the representation of personal names in certain non-Latin scripts effectively. I would be happy to help with examples in Arabic if needed. 

Iman 

I agree that the proposal looks good, and that it would benefit from an additional non-Western example. Switching to my RDA Examples Editor hat, I'm happy to work with NARDAC to add a variety of examples to the Toolkit to illustrate the proposed changes once they're implemented.

Colleagues-

NARDAC has submitted a revision proposal, RSC/NARDAC/2025/1, Proposal on numerals associated with given names.
This parallels MARC Proposal No. 2025-02: Redefining Subfield $b in X00 Fields in the MARC 21 Authority and Bibliographic Formats, discussed at the MARC Advisory Committee meeting in January.

We have an opportunity to comment on this NARDAC proposal, although the time frame is short.

To meet NARDAC's response deadline, please reply to this post with any comments you have about this proposal.  All members of this community (whether CC:DA members or not) are welcome to comment.

DEADLINE: Close of business, March 4, 2025.

As always, I apologize for the short amount of time we have to gather the CC:DA comments.

Kathy

Colleagues-

NARDAC has submitted a revision proposal, RSC/NARDAC/2025/1, Proposal on numerals associated with given names.
This parallels MARC Proposal No. 2025-02: Redefining Subfield $b in X00 Fields in the MARC 21 Authority and Bibliographic Formats, discussed at the MARC Advisory Committee meeting in January.

We have an opportunity to comment on this NARDAC proposal, although the time frame is short.

To meet NARDAC's response deadline, please reply to this post with any comments you have about this proposal.  All members of this community (whether CC:DA members or not) are welcome to comment.

DEADLINE: Close of business, March 4, 2025.

As always, I apologize for the short amount of time we have to gather the CC:DA comments.

Kathy

This proposal looks good to me as well, and I agree with others about the addition of another non-Western example.

Colleagues-

NARDAC has submitted a revision proposal, RSC/NARDAC/2025/1, Proposal on numerals associated with given names.
This parallels MARC Proposal No. 2025-02: Redefining Subfield $b in X00 Fields in the MARC 21 Authority and Bibliographic Formats, discussed at the MARC Advisory Committee meeting in January.

We have an opportunity to comment on this NARDAC proposal, although the time frame is short.

To meet NARDAC's response deadline, please reply to this post with any comments you have about this proposal.  All members of this community (whether CC:DA members or not) are welcome to comment.

DEADLINE: Close of business, March 4, 2025.

As always, I apologize for the short amount of time we have to gather the CC:DA comments.

Kathy

Colleagues-

NARDAC has submitted a revision proposal, RSC/NARDAC/2025/1, Proposal on numerals associated with given names.
This parallels MARC Proposal No. 2025-02: Redefining Subfield $b in X00 Fields in the MARC 21 Authority and Bibliographic Formats, discussed at the MARC Advisory Committee meeting in January.

We have an opportunity to comment on this NARDAC proposal, although the time frame is short.

To meet NARDAC's response deadline, please reply to this post with any comments you have about this proposal.  All members of this community (whether CC:DA members or not) are welcome to comment.

DEADLINE: Close of business, March 4, 2025.

As always, I apologize for the short amount of time we have to gather the CC:DA comments.

Kathy

Colleagues-

NARDAC has submitted a revision proposal, RSC/NARDAC/2025/1, Proposal on numerals associated with given names.
This parallels MARC Proposal No. 2025-02: Redefining Subfield $b in X00 Fields in the MARC 21 Authority and Bibliographic Formats, discussed at the MARC Advisory Committee meeting in January.

We have an opportunity to comment on this NARDAC proposal, although the time frame is short.

To meet NARDAC's response deadline, please reply to this post with any comments you have about this proposal.  All members of this community (whether CC:DA members or not) are welcome to comment.

DEADLINE: Close of business, March 4, 2025.

As always, I apologize for the short amount of time we have to gather the CC:DA comments.

Kathy

The proposal is a sound one and I am happy to add my support (and that of the CLA) to it.  I do wonder, though, if, in the 3rd line of the 2nd paragraph of the Background section, it is necessary to include the qualifier "(or numerals)"  in the phrase  "regnal numbers (or numerals)", especially as part of the spirit of the proposal is to go beyond the use of numerals alone and to allow for the use of written-out words as well.  

Colleagues-

NARDAC has submitted a revision proposal, RSC/NARDAC/2025/1, Proposal on numerals associated with given names.
This parallels MARC Proposal No. 2025-02: Redefining Subfield $b in X00 Fields in the MARC 21 Authority and Bibliographic Formats, discussed at the MARC Advisory Committee meeting in January.

We have an opportunity to comment on this NARDAC proposal, although the time frame is short.

To meet NARDAC's response deadline, please reply to this post with any comments you have about this proposal.  All members of this community (whether CC:DA members or not) are welcome to comment.

DEADLINE: Close of business, March 4, 2025.

As always, I apologize for the short amount of time we have to gather the CC:DA comments.

Kathy

Hi there,

I received no comments from the Metadata Interest Group constituency, but agree that the proposal is sensible.  I support the proposal.

The proposal is a sound one and I am happy to add my support (and that of the CLA) to it.  I do wonder, though, if, in the 3rd line of the 2nd paragraph of the Background section, it is necessary to include the qualifier "(or numerals)"  in the phrase  "regnal numbers (or numerals)", especially as part of the spirit of the proposal is to go beyond the use of numerals alone and to allow for the use of written-out words as well.  

Colleagues-

NARDAC has submitted a revision proposal, RSC/NARDAC/2025/1, Proposal on numerals associated with given names.
This parallels MARC Proposal No. 2025-02: Redefining Subfield $b in X00 Fields in the MARC 21 Authority and Bibliographic Formats, discussed at the MARC Advisory Committee meeting in January.

We have an opportunity to comment on this NARDAC proposal, although the time frame is short.

To meet NARDAC's response deadline, please reply to this post with any comments you have about this proposal.  All members of this community (whether CC:DA members or not) are welcome to comment.

DEADLINE: Close of business, March 4, 2025.

As always, I apologize for the short amount of time we have to gather the CC:DA comments.

Kathy