Divisions
American Assn. of School Librarians (AASL)
Assn. for Library Service to Children (ALSC)
Assn. of College & Research Libraries (ACRL)
Core: Leadership, Infrastructure, Futures
Public Library Assn. (PLA)
Reference & User Services Assn. (RUSA)
United for Libraries (Trustees, Friends, Foundations)
Young Adult Library Services Assn. (YALSA)
Round Tables
Coretta Scott King Book Awards (CSKBART)
Ethnic & Multicultural Info. Exchange (EMIERT)
Film & Media (FMRT)
Games & Gaming (GameRT)
Graphic Novel & Comics (GNCRT)
Government Documents (GODORT)
Intellectual Freedom (IFRT)
International Relations (IRRT)
Learning (LearnRT)
Library History (LHRT)
Library Instruction (LIRT)
Library Research (LRRT)
Library Support Staff (LSSRT)
Map & Geospatial Information (MAGIRT)
New Members (NMRT)
Rainbow (RRT)
Retired Members Round Table (RMRT)
Social Responsibilities (SRRT)
Sustainability (SustainRT)
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
Login
Skip auxiliary navigation (Press Enter).
Contact Us
ALA.org
Core Website
Code of Conduct
Skip main navigation (Press Enter).
Toggle navigation
Home
Core Connect Home
ALA Connect Home
Communities
All Core Groups
Core Members Community
Interest Groups
Sections
- Access & Equity
- Buildings & Operations
- Leadership & Management
- Metadata & Collections
- Preservation
- Technology
All My Core Groups
My Connect
My Profile
Community Notification Settings
Privacy Settings
My Content
All My Groups
My Connections
My Inbox
Find
Continuing Education Calendar
Core Member Directory
Free Recordings
Public Core Documents
Recent Core Discussions
Participate
Find Your Core - Get Involved
Volunteer for a Committee
Start a discussion
Upload a file
Join Core
Donate or Sponsor
Learn about Core Membership
Core Faceted Subject Access Interest Group
FSAIG Core IG Week 2025 presentation slides
Recommend
Mar 05, 2025 11:32 AM
Su Hyeon Kang
Statistics
0 Favorited
16 Views
3 Files
0 Shares
9 Downloads
Attachment(s)
Download All
a feasibility study
669 KB
1 version
Uploaded - Mar 05, 2025
The introduction of MARC 386 field allows catalogers to record creator’s/contributor’s characteristics in bibliographic records to provide access through demographic data points. Given it’s a relatively underutilized MARC field, legacy records generally do not have this piece of information in them. Even if libraries are committed to using MARC 386 in all current cataloging, its absence in legacy records could skew the search results and give a wrong representation of the coverage of a library collection. How to add MARC 386 into legacy records efficiently is the crux of the issue. This presentation will talk about the results of an experiment leveraging the Library of Congress Name Authority File and Wikidata to populate the MARC 386 field in legacy records. After giving an overview of the mechanism of this automated process, the presenter will evaluate the process based on both quantitative and qualitative data and discuss limitations and potential improvements.
Download
Faceted subject vocabularies increase representation of m...
1.15 MB
1 version
Uploaded - Mar 05, 2025
The words a community uses to describe itself are important, especially when that community is marginalized, such as the LGBTQ+ community. In biomedical research, the standard MeSH controlled vocabulary provided by the premier biomedical database PubMed contains 45 terms relevant to LGBTQ+ identities. In comparison, the community-built controlled vocabulary Homosaurus contains 1,263. Now that MeSH can operate as a faceted subject vocabulary, the percentage of Homosaurus terms covered by MeSH jumps from 4% to 36%. The inclusion of more sexual and gender minority identities in biomedical research contributes to the battle against health inequity. My presentation will cover why this representation is important specifically in the context of biomedical research, how I conducted my comparison of vocabularies, and where to go from here as over half of the identities represented in the Homosaurus are still not represented in the MeSH vocabulary.
Download
Use of Faceted Vocabularies as Subjects in Metadata at UNT
1.87 MB
1 version
Uploaded - Mar 05, 2025
The Digital Collections hosted by the University of North Texas Libraries include over 3 million digital objects from a wide range of provenances and resource types. Metadata records are described by editors from various departments of the Libraries and across multiple partner institutions, generally averaging 80-90 unique editors per month. All items are described using a locally-qualified Dublin Core schema (UNTL), which requires at least two subject values per record. This can include a combination of keywords and controlled terms from several vocabularies using a qualifier to label the “type” of subject for each value. These types include a local subject hierarchy, the University of North Texas Browse Subjects (UNTL-BS), to support browse-by-subject functionality, as well as a number of externally-controlled terms from AAT, LCGFT, LCMPT, and others. For vocabularies that expose terms as linked open data and that contain no more than 20,000 terms, we have also introduced searchable interfaces and validation in our metadata web forms to aid editors with adding authorized values. Although helpful, it has also created additional challenges, such as editors using terms from searchable vocabularies that may not be appropriate to an item or collection. This presentation will discuss our local approach to the use of multiple vocabularies simultaneously, the tools that we have implemented to validate those terms, and the benefits and challenges of subject assignment in a large digital library.
Download
Download Document
Please accept the terms of the copyright associated with this attachment before downloading it. Click the link below to read the terms.
Accept
Related Entries and Links
No Related Resource entered.
© 2009-2021 American Library Association
Powered by
Higher Logic
Site design by
eConverse Media
Powered by Higher Logic