Core CC:DA Public Space

Portraits of three Core members with caption Become a Member: Find Your Home: Core.

 

  • 1.  Review of RSC/ExamplesEditor/2026/1

    Posted 22 days ago

    Please review the document at the link below and provide comments no later than Friday, May 29th.

    Proposal to revise the preferred order of recording sources for early printed resources in Data provenance: Recording a source of metadata that is a manifestation that is being described

    https://www.rdatoolkit.org/sites/default/files/uploads/RSC-ExamplesEditor-2026-1.pdf



    ------------------------------
    Karl Pettitt
    Coordinator of Cataloging and Metadata Services
    University of Denver Libraries
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Review of RSC/ExamplesEditor/2026/1

    Posted 18 days ago

    These proposal revisions make sense to me and I can't think of any issues these recommended revisions would cause.



    ------------------------------
    Chelsea Hoover
    MLA Liasion to CC:DA
    Catalog Librarian of Music
    Syracuse University Libraries
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Review of RSC/ExamplesEditor/2026/1

    Posted 18 days ago

    I have no objections to this proposal, especially since it appears to represent an international agreement on preferred sources.

    Kathy



    ------------------------------
    Kathy Glennan
    Director, Cataloging & Metadata Services
    University of Maryland Libraries
    she/her/hers
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Review of RSC/ExamplesEditor/2026/1

    Posted 18 days ago

    I agree with the proposed change. I'm a big fan of making documentation more consistent.

    Also, early printed materials were generally not issued with covers/jackets, so the revised order of the list makes a lot of sense.   



    ------------------------------
    Thumy Webb
    Original Cataloging Librarian
    Rice University, Houston TX
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Review of RSC/ExamplesEditor/2026/1

    Posted 14 days ago

    The proposed revision for the reordered list of preferred sources for early printed resources makes sense to me:

    1. Title page / title sheet / title card
    2. Colophon
    3. Caption
    4. Cover or jacket issued with the manifestation

    This modest but meaningful change promotes clarity, reduces cross‑standard inconsistency, and supports catalogers working with both RDA and rare‑materials frameworks such as DCRMR.  I support this proposal.

    Amanda



    ------------------------------
    Amanda Z. Xu
    Team Lead, Librarian (Metadata)
    National Agricultural Library
    Beltsville, Maryland, USA
    amanda.xu@usda.gov
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: Review of RSC/ExamplesEditor/2026/1

    Posted 11 days ago

    I did not get any feedback from the Metadata Interest Group, but I support this proposal.



    ------------------------------
    Timothy Ryan Mendenhall (he/him)
    Metadata Librarian, Columbia University
    CORE Metadata Interest Group Liaison to CC:DA
    trm2151@columbia.edu
    ------------------------------