Core Subject Analysis Committee Public Space

  • Private Community
  • Private Community
last person joined: 2 months ago 

✉ Send an email to ALA-CoreSACPublicSpace@ConnectedCommunity.org to start a discussion or share a file.
Portraits of three Core members with caption Become a Member: Find Your Home: Core.

 

  • 1.  RBMS Liaison Report

    Posted Jul 08, 2024 03:33 PM
      |   view attached

    Hi all,

     

    Please find attached my liaison report from the RBMS Controlled Vocabularies Editorial Group.

     

    Best wishes,

    Rebecca

    ______________________________

    Rebecca Flore, PhD
    Special Collections Metadata Librarian

    The Hanna Holborn Gray Special Collections Research Center 
    The University of Chicago 
    Regenstein Library 
    1100 E. 57th St., Chicago, IL 60637

    T 773.702.7602 
    rflore@uchicago.edu

    lib.uchicago.edu/scrc | additional info

     

    Attachment(s)

    docx
    SAC24_AN_RBMS.docx   17 KB 1 version


  • 2.  RE: RBMS Liaison Report

    Posted Jul 15, 2024 08:35 AM

    Rebecca--

    I have a question about the CVEG report. You can answer as part of the SAC meeting if you want.

    I looked at the form for proposing new or revised terms. I wonder if you have gotten any responses, particularly whether anyone had given you as much information as the form calls for. ARLIS/NA Cataloging Advisory Committee and Art SACO both went for simpler forms under the assumption that the proposal suggestion might lead to a "reference interview" in which you gleaned more fodder for the new or revised term.

    https://forms.gle/9jQKG3osUFpuheTr7 (CAC form)

    https://sites.google.com/site/artsaco/terminology-suggestions (Art SACO)

    Thanks.

    Sherman



    ------------------------------
    D Sherman Clarke
    New York University (retired)
    He/Him/His
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: RBMS Liaison Report

    Posted Jul 15, 2024 12:08 PM

    Hi Sherman,

     

    Thanks for your question! Only a few of the fields in CVEG's proposal form are actually required fields, and we only expect proposers to fill out fields that seem applicable and for which they can easily ascertain the information. We've had a few proposals come in so far with a pretty wide range of how much detail the proposers included. If a proposal is on the sparse side and CVEG finds that we need additional information about a proposed new or revised term, the co-editors will reach out to the proposer via email to get clarification.

     

    You make a good point, though-it's not clear from our instructions what information is required/not required or how much detail CVEG is expecting in a proposal. Thanks for sharing links to the CAC and Art SACO forms. I'll pass them along to the CVEG co-editors, and hopefully CVEG can discuss how to make our expectations for proposers clearer.

     

    Best wishes,

    Rebecca

    ______________________________

    Rebecca Flore, PhD
    Special Collections Metadata Librarian

    The Hanna Holborn Gray Special Collections Research Center 
    The University of Chicago 
    Regenstein Library 
    1100 E. 57th St., Chicago, IL 60637

    T 773.702.7602 
    rflore@uchicago.edu

    lib.uchicago.edu/scrc | additional info

     




    Original Message