Core Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Libraries Interest Group

  • Private Community
  • Private Community
 View Only
last person joined: 2 days ago 

✉ Send an email to ALA-CoreAIAndMachineLearningInLibraries@ConnectedCommunity.org to start a discussion or share a file.

About this Group

👐 Anyone can view all content in the group, but only people who join it can post to it. Anyone can join to participate.


Purpose: Provides a forum for researching potential applications of Machine and Deep Learning in library science, including discussions, publications, and outreach to the wider Library community. Its goal is to educate librarians on uses of the complex techniques of machine learning and to provide a space for critically thinking both about new applications, and about the ethical and social impact of these technologies , as the field rapidly expands in the coming decade.

This group is part of Core's Technology Section.

Portraits of three Core members with caption Become a Member: Find Your Home: Core.

 

Back to discussions
Expand all | Collapse all

AI and *Search strategy for "rapid scoping review" - on topic for Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology

  • 1.  AI and *Search strategy for "rapid scoping review" - on topic for Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology

    Posted Jan 23, 2024 08:53 AM

    Hi all !  I have a question about using AI search tools for searching. See near bottom of this email.

    I apologize for lengthy email.   

    Background: I am working on a "rapid scoping review" on a topic in "theoretical & philosophical psychology". My "goal" has been/is to create a *search to support an initial "map" of the overlap of three broad areas: a. free will, b. AI, and c. the Chinese room argument.  Right now I am mostly focused on creating a "search "strategy for the project.  Creating an *initial map based on that will be another part of the project. 

    The results from this initial search work will be used in a poster accepted for this meeting in April.  If interested in the current status of the project, you can see this OSF site: https://osf.io/t43xs/

    Of course I am going to be monitoring and working to fully record the steps I actually take for searching. So far I am using EBSCO databases (APA PsycInfo, Philosophers Index, Computers & Applied Sciences Complete, Computer Source), ACM Digital Library, and Google Scholar (via Publish or Perish). And I am working on a protocol that I will be using.   I may also include PhilPapers, PsyArXiv, PhilArchive, and PhilSci-Archive) in the search. That said,  I do not intend to be "comprehensive".  Rather, I hope to create a product (systematic search for the rapid scoping review) that can be valuable. The product, in turn, could possibly serve as basis for a fuller Scoping review, etc. 

    QUESTION(S): For ideas to supplement my traditional search planning for a "rapid scoping review", does anyone have a *workflow* that they *have *used (or might suggest) that I could consider or adapt for incorporating AI tools such as Research Rabbit, etc. in search plan ?   What used, when, how, why ? Issues ?  Concerns ? Challenges ?  Recommendations ?

    Additional note: If anyone would be willing to do peer review of my search strategy when I post it to OSF, that would be great….just email me at this address ->   pfehrma1@kent.edu

    I hope this is clear.  Anyway, I would appreciate anything that anyone might share on my question. 

    _______ more background re: "systematic review methods" and *philosophy___________

    ____________________________________________

    Thanks for any help ! 



    ------------------------------
    Paul Fehrmann
    Research Librarian, Associate Professor Emeritus
    University Libraries, Kent State University
    pfehrma1@kent.edu
    ORCid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6177-4769
    ------------------------------