Core Collection Evaluation & Assessment Interest Group

 View Only
last person joined: yesterday 

✉ Send an email to ALA-CoreCollectionEvaluationAndAssessment@ConnectedCommunity.org to start a discussion or share a file.

About this Group

👐 Anyone can view all content in the group, but only people who join it can post to it. Anyone can join to participate.


Purpose: Dedicated to quantitative measures based on commonly defined data; managing information resources and developing institutional benchmarking; explores, develops, and promotes the use of both descriptive data and outcomes/impacts data.

This interest group is part of Core's Preservation Section.

Portraits of three Core members with caption Become a Member: Find Your Home: Core.

 

Presentation 1 - ALA Annual Collection Evaluation & Assessment IG

  • 1.  Presentation 1 - ALA Annual Collection Evaluation & Assessment IG

    Posted Sep 10, 2012 11:27 PM
      |   view attached

    Evaluating Big Deals

    Beth Bernhardt, UNC-Greensboro

    Due to major budget cuts over the past three years UNC Greensboro has had to look closely at cutting its ‘Big Deal’ journal collections. After gathering use statistics, pricing, impact factors, and other journal information, a spreadsheet was constructed to compare the library’s Big Deals.  By examining parameters such as total cost, total use, cost per use, and cost per title, the library was able to determine the cost of subscribing to high-use journals and identify which collections could be cut. This process was helpful in showing to administrators which Big Deal is right for the University and which could be eliminated. Other organizations are now using this model to evaluate their Big Deals.

    Attachment(s)