Evidence Synthesis Methods Interest Group

Hi all.  Two things.

1.     I saw this today (will be reading).  Thought I would post just FYI….
   Qureshi, R., Shaughnessy, D., Gill, K.A.R. et al. Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation?. Syst Rev 12, 72 (2023). Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? - Systematic Reviews
2.       A "related note".  I noticed this yesterday on Twitter.  Does anyone have experience with this resource or comments about it. OpenEvidence https://www.openevidence.com/about. This was the Twitter note: " TL;Dr. - a new AI tool for triaging new clinical evidence. You'll never have to read another paper."    This is from the web page: OpenEvidence is our contribution to the global effort of taming the medical information firehose: Our approach uses novel technology to structure and present clinical evidence in understandable, clinically-useful formats that can be used to make more evidenced-based decisions and improve patient outcomes.     Right now  looks like you have to have a medical specialty it to register/create an account, and I don't have that. Although I did apply to be a beta tester.  

Hi all.  Two things.

1.     I saw this today (will be reading).  Thought I would post just FYI….
   Qureshi, R., Shaughnessy, D., Gill, K.A.R. et al. Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation?. Syst Rev 12, 72 (2023). Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? - Systematic Reviews
2.       A "related note".  I noticed this yesterday on Twitter.  Does anyone have experience with this resource or comments about it. OpenEvidence https://www.openevidence.com/about. This was the Twitter note: " TL;Dr. - a new AI tool for triaging new clinical evidence. You'll never have to read another paper."    This is from the web page: OpenEvidence is our contribution to the global effort of taming the medical information firehose: Our approach uses novel technology to structure and present clinical evidence in understandable, clinically-useful formats that can be used to make more evidenced-based decisions and improve patient outcomes.     Right now  looks like you have to have a medical specialty it to register/create an account, and I don't have that. Although I did apply to be a beta tester.  

Hi all.  Two things.

1.     I saw this today (will be reading).  Thought I would post just FYI….
   Qureshi, R., Shaughnessy, D., Gill, K.A.R. et al. Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation?. Syst Rev 12, 72 (2023). Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? - Systematic Reviews
2.       A "related note".  I noticed this yesterday on Twitter.  Does anyone have experience with this resource or comments about it. OpenEvidence https://www.openevidence.com/about. This was the Twitter note: " TL;Dr. - a new AI tool for triaging new clinical evidence. You'll never have to read another paper."    This is from the web page: OpenEvidence is our contribution to the global effort of taming the medical information firehose: Our approach uses novel technology to structure and present clinical evidence in understandable, clinically-useful formats that can be used to make more evidenced-based decisions and improve patient outcomes.     Right now  looks like you have to have a medical specialty it to register/create an account, and I don't have that. Although I did apply to be a beta tester.