Defense of the International Responsibilities Task Force (IRTF)
The International Responsibilities Task Force has been, and must remain, a vital part of SRRT. From its founding, SRRT has recognized that the social responsibilities of librarianship do not stop at national borders. Information freedom, human rights, peace, and global solidarity are international issues, and librarians in the United States cannot responsibly claim to serve the public good while ignoring U.S. foreign policy, global inequalities, or the struggles of librarians and communities abroad.
The Program Assessment Overview suggests that the IRTF's distinctiveness is questionable because other ALA units-such as the International Relations Round Table or the International Relations Committee-also address "international issues." But this is precisely the point of IRTF's existence: where those other groups focus on professional exchange, diplomacy, or institutional relations, IRTF brings a justice-centered and political perspective. We address the ethical responsibilities of librarians in relation to war, colonialism, censorship, international solidarity, and global human rights. No other ALA unit does this work, and to fold IRTF into bureaucratic structures that avoid politics would be to erase its distinctiveness entirely.
The criteria used in the assessment-financial sustainability, staff effort, "alignment with strategic priorities"-are especially ill-suited for judging IRTF. Its value cannot be measured by budget cycles or consultant rubrics. Its value lies in its willingness to stand with librarians under repression, to challenge ALA when it has remained silent about U.S. wars and interventions, and to connect our profession to broader struggles for peace and justice worldwide. That role is not duplicative; it is unique.
IRTF has consistently brought forward resolutions, programs, and information resources that highlight issues other units will not touch. From opposing apartheid to resisting wars of aggression, from standing with Palestinian librarians to defending global freedom of expression, IRTF has shown that the library profession's responsibilities are inseparable from international solidarity. To dismiss or weaken IRTF would not only diminish SRRT, but also diminish ALA's credibility as an organization that claims to uphold intellectual freedom and human rights.
The fact that task forces are evaluated by whether they meet twice a year, file minutes, or maintain websites misses the essence of IRTF's work. This is not a bureaucratic service committee but a political and ethical working group. Its continued existence signals that ALA understands librarianship as an internationalist profession bound by responsibilities that transcend borders.
We therefore reject any suggestion that IRTF be discontinued, merged, or "reimagined" out of existence. Instead, we call on ALA to recognize IRTF as essential to the conscience of the Association-distinct, irreplaceable, and truer than ever to SRRT's founding mandate.
Mark Rosenzweig
SRRTAC/IRTF rep
------------------------------
Mark Rosenzweig
------------------------------