Thanks for sharing, Alissa. I blocked off some time Monday morning to read and very much look forward to it. Looks like a very thorough and fascinating article with great import and I look forward to chatting with Sarah about it too since we are colleagues at UMass.
As it happens, our evidence synthesis service has recently caught the attention of education faculty, so this will be highly useful. Since I haven't engaged with education researchers much before, I'm reading up and just learned of the What Works Clearinghouse. I didn't know that DoE was funding evidence synthesis in education! As a follow-up to reading your paper, I plan to see which databases were employed for some of the systematic reviews they contracted out and in which databases the journals that published their included articles are indexed.
If others have experience or opinions on What Works Clearinghouse, I'd be very curious. Looks like a very high quality undertaking that is mirroring AHRQ systematic reviews at the surface level. The other resource I plan to check out is the Campbell Collaboration Education Coordinating Group (ECG):
https://www.campbellcollaboration.org/education/reviews/. If there are other best-in-class resources that I could use for benchmarking when starting to do evidence synthesis in education, I would love to have your recommendations!
Best,
Eric
Eric Toole (he/him) | Evidence Synthesis Librarian
Science & Engineering Library
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
(413) 545-6151
Original Message:
Sent: 4/1/2025 4:13:00 PM
From: Alissa Droog
Subject: RE: Upcoming changes to ERIC from an evidence synthesis perspective
Hi again,
The study mentioned above which investigates coverage overlaps between Education databases and alternatives to ERIC is finally out and was published open access. It's available below:
Fitzgerald, S. R., Weaver, K. D., & Droog, A. (2025). Selecting a specialized education database for literature reviews and evidence synthesis projects. Research Synthesis Methods, 16(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/rsm.2024.11
------------------------------
Alissa Droog
Assistant Professor, Education & Social Sciences Librarian
Northern Illinois University
She/Her/Hers
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: Mar 28, 2025 01:12 PM
From: Alissa Droog
Subject: Upcoming changes to ERIC from an evidence synthesis perspective
Hi Eric,
We haven't taken a super active role in notifying education students or faculty about changes to ERIC just yet, but I think I will be helping to circulate a mass email to them in the next couple of weeks once we know more.
As for a replacement database, I actually do have thoughts on this. Sara Fitzgerald, Kari D. Weaver and I just completed an comparative analysis of the journal coverage of 4 top education databases that should be coming out in Research Synthesis Methods any day now. When we compared the ISSN-level coverage of ERIC (IES), Education Source (EBSCO), Education Database (ProQuest) and Educator's Reference Complete (Gale), we found that 1) these databases are more unique than they are similar, but if you're going to pick 1 database to use, Education Source has the most unique titles and the most titles. Education Source Ultimate hadn't been announced when we worked with the data last, but I think the findings still stand. Abstract for the forthcoming article is below.
Title: What constitutes a "comprehensive literature search" in education?: Education database coverage overlaps Abstract: While the Institute of Education Science's ERIC is often recommended for comprehensive literature searching in the field of education, there are several other specialized education databases to discover education literature. This study investigates journal coverage overlaps between four specialized education databases: Education Source (EBSCO), Education Database (ProQuest), ERIC (Institute of Education Sciences), and Educator's Reference Complete (Gale). Out of a total of 4,695 unique journals analyzed, there are 2,831 journals uniquely covered by only one database, as well as many journals covered by only two or three databases. Findings show that evidence synthesis projects and literature reviews benefit from careful selection of multiple specialized education databases, and that ERIC is insufficient as the primary education database for comprehensive searching in the field.
Alissa Droog (she/her/hers)
Assistant Professor | Education & Social Science Librarian
Northern Illinois University
------------------------------
Alissa Droog
Assistant Professor, Education & Social Sciences Librarian
Northern Illinois University
She/Her/Hers
------------------------------