Evidence Synthesis Methods Interest Group

 View Only
last person joined: yesterday 

Charge: To promote and develop competencies around evidence synthesis including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, and other related methods of research synthesis, through activities such as: Facilitating discussion and peer-support; Creating and managing a resource page; Encouraging programming and publications around systematic reviews through ACRL.
Community members can post as a new Discussion or email ALA-acrlesmig@ConnectedCommunity.org
Before you post: please note job postings are prohibited on ALA Connect. Please see the Code of Conduct for more information.
  • 1.  "state of the art" knowledge synthesis

    Posted Jan 30, 2024 01:56 PM

    Hi, all

    So a colleague of mine was approached by a doctoral student about "state of the art" knowledge synthesis. I have never heard of this research method, have any of you?

     

    Just curious...and, well, sharing too.

    Best,

    Anita

     

    Anita Kuiken, MSLIS, AHIP (queue-ken)
    (Pronouns: she/her/hers)
    Librarian for Falk College of Sport & Human Dynamics
    Research Impact Team
    Syracuse University Libraries

    O 315-443-9766
    akuiken@syr.edu
    LinkedIn

    Need help with research? Find library content from these research guides in the areas I support: Exercise Science | Food Studies | Human Development & Family Science | Marriage & Family Therapy | Nutrition Science & Dietetics | Public Health | Social Work | Sport Management | Aging Studies l Stabler Running Collection

    130 Sims Dr., Syracuse, NY 13244
    library.syr.edu

    Syracuse University

     

     



  • 2.  RE: "state of the art" knowledge synthesis

    Posted Jan 31, 2024 07:58 AM

    Hi Anita,

     

    Unsure if this is helpful, but I'm sharing my experience.

     

    Our school has a faculty member from Canada who introduced the library team to similar methodologies, such as realist and umbrella reviews. Although I have not completed a SoAR, when tasked with these sorts of "newer" paper types, I will go into PubMed and do a quick search to find such studies and read the methodology. Hopefully, they used a librarian on the paper, and I'm golden. I did a quick search in Equator Network and did not see this paper type.

    But I might have missed it. You can write to EN; they'll point you in the right direction if there are reporting guidelines. I have also learned that some of these paper types originated in the social sciences, and you might take a quick look at those databases. For example, phenomenology studies are entering the medical literature.

     

    I suggest that the doctoral student have an advisor (at the school or outside) who has at least completed a true SR, preferably SoAR. I have seen students take these sorts of things on, with faculty who may need more training on completing an SR, and the paper turns into an unpublishable hot mess. (I am usually the person on the library team to attempt a paper rehabilitation). Faculty are excellent in writing hypothesis-driven research, but reviews are entirely different. Also, ask if the student has factored in the time it takes to write a SoAR. They are most likely dedicated to 9-12 months of research, reading, and writing, or approximately 1,000 hours. This is not to discourage a student from this type of research, just to be realistic about what is possible in the amount of time to graduation. (I have many unfinished SRs and Metas; it's sad. After students match, they abandon and move on).

     

    Through a literature search on SoAR combined with a similar topic that the student plans to write, I suggest contacting authors who have published for consultation. I follow a few librarian authors who publish well-written SRs that I consult when I need clarification on my own projects.

     

    My library colleagues will write the complex search strings for all the bibliographic databases identified, and in return, we ask for authorship or acknowledgment. For the doctoral student, if you write the search strings or peer-review the search strings they wrote, you should get credit on the published paper.

     

    I hope you find this helpful. If you write a SoAR, I hope you'll share your adventures with us.

     

    Best of luck!

    Liz

     

    Liz Lorbeer, EdM, MLS, AHIP-D

    Chair and Professor | Library Director

    Medical Library

    Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine

    1000 Oakland Drive, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008 USA

    ORCID |LinkedIn

     


    As of April 1st, 2023, WMed's email domain has changed. @med.wmich.edu is now @wmed.edu. Please update your contacts with the new domain.

    This electronic message is intended for the named recipient(s) only, and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If you are not the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient, please notify us immediately by contacting the sender at the electronic mail address noted above,and delete and destroy all copies of this message. Thank you.






  • 3.  RE: "state of the art" knowledge synthesis

    Posted Jan 31, 2024 09:20 PM

    Hi, Liz.

    Thank you for your thoughtful response!

    I assumed it would be something similar to other evidence synthesis projects. I appreciate your sharing your process. It's funny when my colleague spelled out "state of the art" I was thrown off, but after seeing its acronym, I realized I had seen it before. There's so much to know; I can't keep up sometimes. Thanks for the reminder about EN – I had forgotten about that!

    Thanks again the time you took to respond.

    Best,

    Anita






  • 4.  RE: "state of the art" knowledge synthesis

    Posted Jan 31, 2024 08:40 AM

    Hi Anita,

    I recommend reading the following articles:

     Barry ES, Merkebu J, Varpio L. How to Conduct a State-of-the-Art Literature Review. J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Dec;14(6):663-665. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00704.1. PMID: 36591421; PMCID: PMC9765899.

    Barry ES, Merkebu J, Varpio L. Understanding State-of-the-Art Literature Reviews. J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Dec;14(6):659-662. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00705.1. PMID: 36591417; PMCID: PMC9765914.

    -Aimee

    Aimee Sgourakis Jenkins

    Lead Librarian for Bibliometric Services

    Lead Librarian for Evidence Synthesis

    Liaison Librarian for Sociology, Psychology, and Geology and Environmental Sciences

    405 Hillman Library| University of Pittsburgh

    E: aimees@pitt.edu



    ------------------------------
    Aimee Jenkins
    Librarian
    University of Pittsburgh
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: "state of the art" knowledge synthesis

    Posted Jan 31, 2024 09:43 PM

    Hi, Aimee.

    Thanks for chiming in. I had gotten to the one Barry article, but not the other, so thanks for sending both along.

    Best,

    Anita






  • 6.  RE: "state of the art" knowledge synthesis

    Posted Feb 01, 2024 03:47 PM

    Looks like there are already some better answers here, no not sure how much this helps, but it does appear in Grant & Booth's typology. That's the only reason I've heard of it.

    Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x



    ------------------------------
    Elle Covington
    Research Specialist Librarian
    University of Nebraska, Lincoln
    They/Them/Theirs
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: "state of the art" knowledge synthesis

    Posted Feb 01, 2024 08:57 PM

    Hi, Elle.

    Thanks for chiming in – I later saw it there too.

    Best,

    Anita