ACRL Image Resources Discussion Group

 View Only
last person joined: one month ago 

Charge: A forum for ongoing discussion of the unique issues presented by the development and support of interdisciplinary image resources in academic libraries.
Community members can post as a new Discussion or email ALA-acrlirdg@ConnectedCommunity.org
Before you post: please note job postings are prohibited on ALA Connect. Please see the Code of Conduct for more information.

Request for Feedback on the Framework for Visual Literacy (Draft)

  • 1.  Request for Feedback on the Framework for Visual Literacy (Draft)

    Posted Jun 07, 2021 01:34 PM

    Request for Feedback

    The ACRL Visual Literacy Task Force is currently seeking feedback on The Framework for Visual Literacy. We are asking you to consider how you might use this document. We would also like to understand how it could be improved to better align with your needs. We thank you in advance for your input to ensure this document is thoughtful and useful.

    Please access the document here. Please provide feedback by using this link

    Background

    In 2009, a group of librarians interested in quality research and instructional image content formed the Image Resources Interest Group within the Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) to focus on the particular affordances and challenges of visual information. That same year, the inaugural Visual Literacy Task Force was formed to craft a set of standards that would complement the now rescinded 2001 ACRL Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education (Information Literacy Standards). The resultant standards, the 2011 Visual Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education (Visual Literacy Standards)  highlighted ways in which visuals are distinct from other information types.

    In the years following the publication of the Visual Literacy Standards, librarians began to engage with threshold conceptsmetacognition, and metaliteracies, reflected in the 2016 ACRL Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education (Framework), which replaced the Information Literacy Standards. Ongoing critical conversation continues to shape how learners are taught to create, use, share, and assess information in the twenty-first century. Addressing these shifts, ACRL assembled several task forces in 2018 to develop Framework Companion Documents and update disciplinary literacy standards documents. In this spirit, the current Visual Literacy Task Force was formed by the Image Resources Interest Group to update the 2011 Visual Literacy Standards.

    At the outset, we acknowledged that visual literacy and related terminology remained difficult to define due to variations in use and meaning across disciplines. We also recognized that mapping to the Framework would be a challenging exercise. Success would require the participation of thoughtfully engaged stakeholders. Therefore, we began by conducting an IRB-approved qualitative research study[i]. From fall 2019 to spring 2021, we interviewed a broad community of practitioners and scholars, including architecture and planning librarians. Participants were asked to define visual literacy, identify necessary skills and competencies for their discipline, and discuss what they perceived as challenges and opportunities.

    By coding the interviews, we identified four themes that serve as the backbone for the current Visual Literacy Framework Companion Document draft. These themes are:

    ·         Perceive visuals as communicating information;

    ·         Participate in a changing information landscape;

    ·         Practice visual discernment and criticality; and

    ·         Pursue social justice through visual practice.

    Timeline

    Please return the survey by July 7, 2021.

    Participants will find the draft in various formats to facilitate accessibility and feedback options on the Task Force website: http://acrlvltf.org/feedback.  If you have any questions, please contact us at vltfacrl@gmail.com

    Current Task Force Members

    Millicent Fullmer (co-chair), University of San Diego

    Tiffany Saulter (co-chair), Deque Systems, Inc.

    Stephanie Beene, University of New Mexico

    Katie Greer, Oakland University

    Maggie Murphy, University of North Carolina, Greensboro

    Sara Schumacher, Texas Tech University

    Dana Statton Thompson, Murray State University

    Mary Wegmann, Sonoma State University

    Past member:

    Kathy Edwards, Clemson University (2018-2019)


    [i] IRB #00001310 was coordinated through the University of San Diego. Co-Principal Investigators were Millicent Fullmer and Dana Statton Thompson. Co-Investigators were Stephanie Beene, Sara Schumacher, Katie Greer, Maggie Murphy, and Mary Wegmann.



    ------------------------------
    Dana Thompson
    Research and Instruction Librarian
    Murray State University
    ------------------------------