Evidence Synthesis Methods Interest Group

 View Only
last person joined: 3 days ago 

Charge: To promote and develop competencies around evidence synthesis including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, and other related methods of research synthesis, through activities such as: Facilitating discussion and peer-support; Creating and managing a resource page; Encouraging programming and publications around systematic reviews through ACRL.
Community members can post as a new Discussion or email ALA-acrlesmig@ConnectedCommunity.org
Before you post: please note job postings are prohibited on ALA Connect. Please see the Code of Conduct for more information.
  • 1.  Data extraction tools

    Posted Oct 04, 2024 02:15 PM
    Hi all,
    I'm working with a team doing a meta-analysis on a large, complicated data set (think: hundreds of papers, data sets with over 1000 columns per row) and they are looking for advice on tools to help them with this (clearly, Covidence will not be best here.) I'm wondering if any of your teams have used anything worth looking into. They've hired some undergrads to help so it will need to be something that can have multiple users and a relatively low learning curve.
    Thanks!
    Megan


    --
    Megan Kocher (she, her, hers)
    Science and Evidence Synthesis Librarian | University Libraries | lib.umn.edu
    University of Minnesota | umn.edu | 612-625-3605

    The University of Minnesota is located on stolen lands of the Dakhóta people.








  • 2.  RE: Data extraction tools

    Posted Oct 07, 2024 10:32 AM
    Hi Megan,
    It might be worth checking out MetaReviewer. I think it's designed to handle complex meta-analyses. We are using it for a review I'm working on, but we haven't gotten far enough yet for me to understand how (or how well) it works. But perhaps worth a look!
    Best,
    Sarah


    ------------------------------
    Sarah Young
    Liaison Librarian
    Carnegie Mellon University
    ------------------------------