ACRL RBMS Bibliographic Standards Committee Rare Books and Manuscripts Section

1 to 50 of 52 threads (206 total posts)
Thread Subject Replies Last Post
Vote requested: AMREMM/DCRM(Mss) Review Group recommendatoin
21 12 days ago by Brittney Washington
Original post by Francis Lapka
Vote requested: Do you approve the draft minutes for the virtual meeting of the Bibliographic Standards Committee on August 28, 2019??
22 12 days ago by Brittney Washington
Original post by Francis Lapka
Vote requested: Do you approve of publication of Examples to Accompany Descriptive Cataloging of Rare Materials (Serials), as currently drafted?
21 one month ago by Iris O'Brien
Original post by Francis Lapka
Vote requested: Do you approve of BSC sponsorship (i.e. endorsement or support) of the proposed panel, "Mitigating Pejorative Terminology in Description Standards," for the 2020 RBMS Conference? See attachment for the revised proposal.
23 2 months ago by Valerie Buck
Original post by Francis Lapka
Vote requested: Do you approve the draft minutes for the meeting of the Bibliographic Standards Committee at ALA Annual 2019?
23 2 months ago by Kalan Davis
Original post by Francis Lapka
Vote requested: Do you approve the revised BSC charge and RBMS manual revisions?
17 7 months ago by Alison Greenlee
Original post by Francis Lapka
This is a test discussion
1 9 months ago by Francis Lapka
Poll: Do you agree that BSC should sponsor the proposed workshop, "Cataloging Rare Materials using RDF : data modeling, linked data & the Rare Materials Ontology Extension" for RBMS in 2018? See attached document for details.
3 2 years ago by Nina Schneider
Poll: Do you agree that the proposed seminar, on RBMS Policy Statements for the 2018 RBMS Conference, be sponsored by the Bibliographic Standards Committee? See attached.
0 2 years ago by Nina Schneider
Poll: Do you agree that the participatory session on item-level metadata during the RBMS conference in June, 2017 be sponsored by the Bibliographic Standards Committee?
0 3 years ago by Nina Schneider
Poll: Do you agree that the proposed seminar, on Contemporary Rare Materials for the 2017 RBMS Conference, be sponsored by the Bibliographic Standards Committee? See attached.
1 3 years ago by Nina Schneider
Poll: Do you agree that the workshop proposed by members of the Descriptive Cataloging of Rare Materials (Music) (DCRM(M)) editorial team, for the 2017 RBMS Conference, be sponsored by the Bibliographic Standards Committee? See attached.
0 3 years ago by Nina Schneider
Poll: Do you agree that the seminar proposed by members of the Descriptive Cataloging of Rare Materials (Manuscripts) (DCRM(MSS)) editorial team, for the 2017 RBMS Conference, be sponsored by the Bibliographic Standards Committee? See attached.
1 3 years ago by Nina Schneider
Poll: Do you agree that Descriptive Cataloging of Rare Materials (Cartographic)(DCRM(C)) should be published as currently drafted? The document can be found at http://rbms.info/dcrm/dcrmc/
0 3 years ago by Nina Schneider
Draft minutes of the RBMS Bibliographic Standards Committee Annual 2015, San Francisco
0 4 years ago by Valerie Buck
Poll: Do you approve of the formation of a BSC task force to explore data elements for rare materials description and their charge as defined in the attached document? Please do not vote if you are not a current member of BSC.
1 4 years ago by Nina Schneider
Final minutes of RBMS Bibliographic Standards Committee, ALA Midwinter 2015, Chicago
0 4 years ago by Michelle Mascaro
Poll: Are you in favor of co-sponsorship in name only for the ALCTS Metadata Interest Group (MIG) hosted virtual preconference, “Planning for the Evolving Role of Metadata Services."
3 4 years ago by Nina Schneider
Draft minutes of the RBMS Bibliographic Standards Committee Midwinter 2015, Chicago
0 4 years ago by Michelle Mascaro
Final minutes of RBMS Bibliographic Standards Committee, ALA Annual 2014, Las Vegas
0 4 years ago by Michelle Mascaro
Poll: Do you approve of the formation of the DCRM Task Force with the attached charge?
1 5 years ago by Nina Schneider
Poll: Do you approve of the formation of a Controlled Vocabularies Editorial Group with the attached charge?
2 5 years ago by Nina Schneider
Poll: Do you agree with the proposed changes to DCRM(G) in the RDA-BSR for Rare Materials? Text is available in pdf or as a document. 1 5 years ago by Nina Schneider
Poll: Do you approve the formation of a new editorial group under the aegis of BSC to create and maintain a consolidated RDA-based DCRM? Please see attachment for details.
1 6 years ago by Nina Schneider
RBMS Bibliographic Standards Committee Annual 2013 Meeting Agenda
0 6 years ago by Jane Carpenter
Test message, please ignore
1 6 years ago by Erin Blake
ACRL/RBMS Bibliographic Standards Committee Midwinter 2013 Draft Minutes
0 6 years ago by Jane Carpenter
Poll: Do you approve of the rule changes as proposed in the attached file?
0 7 years ago by Jane Carpenter
Poll: Do you approve the revised draft of the RDA BIBCO Standard Record for Rare Materials as presented in the attached PDF file? 0 7 years ago by Jane Carpenter
Poll: Do you approve of the changes pertaining to relator terms described in the attached PDF? 0 7 years ago by Ryan Hildebrand
Final Minutes of the Bibliographic Standards Committee Meeting, ALA Midwinter 2012, Dallas, TX
0 7 years ago by Jane Carpenter
Draft Minutes of the Bibliographic Standards Committee Meeting, ALA Annual 2012
0 7 years ago by Jane Carpenter
Bibliographic Standards Committee Agenda for Annual 2012 0 7 years ago by Jane Carpenter
Bib Standards statement on RDA
0 7 years ago by Jane Carpenter
Poll: Do you approve the petition of the Bibliographic Standards Committee to the CaMMS Executive Board for an invitation to appoint a representative to CC: DA, as described in the attached document?
0 7 years ago by Jane Carpenter
Poll: Do you approve the statement of instructions to catalogers created by the Bibliographic Standards Committee Task Force on RDA, as described in the attached document?
0 7 years ago by Jane Carpenter
Poll: Proposal: Unite area 0 rules for spacing under 0G4 by moving 0G10 directly into the 0G4 hierarchy, as 0G4.4, with existing headings intact. [Informally proposed on DCRM-L Mar 15; formally proposed Mar 19. UPDATE: PDF has copy/paste error to be fixed
0 7 years ago by Erin Blake
Bibliographic Standards Committee Midwinter 2012 Meeting Agenda
0 7 years ago by Jane Carpenter
Poll: Do you agree with the re-wording of 7A1.1 described at http://connect.ala.org/node/142579 ? 0 8 years ago by Erin Blake
DPC: wording change to 7A1.1 for clarity 0 8 years ago by Erin Blake
DPC: Make a note indicating information is fictitious or incorrect even if correction cannot be supplied (4A4, etc.) 2 8 years ago by Erin Blake
DPC: Supplied modern forms of place names (DCRM 4B3) 1 8 years ago by Erin Blake
DPC: Change "special files" to "special indexes" in DCRM 7A1.4?
2 8 years ago by Erin Blake
DPC: Omission of names in statements of responsibility (DCRM 1E5)
2 8 years ago by Erin Blake
DPC: first and last sentences under “Optional local note” in VIII.2. also belong with the previous instruction (“Local note”) 3 8 years ago by Erin Blake
DPC: Mandatory note on supplied date inconsistency
1 8 years ago by Erin Blake
Poll: Do you agree with the changes about notes on fictitious or incorrect information at http://connect.ala.org/node/130154?
0 8 years ago by Erin Blake
Poll: Do you agree with the changes to "VIII.2. Notes" described at http://connect.ala.org/node/129533?
0 8 years ago by Erin Blake
Poll: Do you agree with omitting the "but Madridii" example and comment in 4B3 as described at http://connect.ala.org/node/128806?
0 8 years ago by Erin Blake
Poll: Do you agree with replacing [et al.] with [and x others] in the s.o.r. as described at http://connect.ala.org/node/128698? 0 8 years ago by Erin Blake