I joined MAGERT nearly 20 years ago. The "Map" in MAGERT coincided with part of my job title and I found MAGERT activities relevant to my work.
To remain viable, MAGERT needs to attract and retain members. Rather than tweaking the name a bit, consider what topics are bringing in new members and see if they can be incorporated into a name that sounds good. "LLAMA" finally added the second L to their name after years of misspellings. I don't believe that most people renew ALA memberships based on the name of the group but whether the activities of the group are relevant to their professional work.
I am very glad that Kathy Weimer put this out for members to discuss. If members can agree on a better name, the round table may be able to attract new members while retaining current ones.
John A. Stevenson
Coordinator, Government Documents and Maps Processing Unit
University of Delaware Library