LRRT (Library Research Round Table)

 View Only
last person joined: 13 hours ago 

LRRT

 Peer-review and tenure applications: definitions?

Christina Norton's profile image
Christina Norton posted Nov 12, 2025 09:48 AM

Hi all,

For those of you whose libraries have tenure-track/tenured librarians:

  • does tenure require peer-reviewed research publications?
  • do you have an established definition of peer-review that you use?

I haven't been able to find any guidelines from ACRL. We are trying to update our guidelines for tenure-track library faculty and what "peer-reviewed" means has been a point of confusion for applicants (and contention among those serving on tenure committees).

Any examples or guiding documents you utilize would be so helpful!

Thanks,

Christina

Erin Owens's profile image
Erin Owens

Hi, Christina,

Oooh, what an interesting question! For faculty librarians in the Newton Gresham Library at Sam Houston State University, yes, peer-reviewed publication is among the requirements to be considered for tenure. The candidate must have at least x (number varies between Dept of Public Services and Dept of Technical Services) "peer-reviewed journal articles." This invites somewhat less debate about what a "peer-reviewed publication" might be, since we further specify the "journal article" part.

If for some reason parties are not in agreement about whether a particular journal generally qualifies as peer-reviewed, we look it up in UlrichsWeb and go by their "refereed" mark. Occasionally we might also have to reference details on the journal's website to discuss whether a specific section or type of submission actually undergoes peer review. 

I will add, though - Our requirements technically say that the candidate must have y citations, of which at least x are peer-reviewed journal articles -- and though the journal articles piece is more specific, the rest of the "citations" are fairly vague. Those could include book chapters, non-peer-reviewed articles/columns, conference presentations, etc. So we could occasionally have some debate within the tenure committee about what counts there (e.g., a single 500-word book review? a ten-minute lightning talk at a conference? etc.). However, in practice, folks usually end up with enough clear/non-debated citations that it's not an issue. 

Cheers,

Erin Owens
Professor, Scholarly Communications Librarian
Associate Director of Library Public Services
Newton Gresham Library, Sam Houston State University