I am not a lesbian.
Yet I edited the well-reviewed collection of essay and lectures of Dorothy M. Broderick, co-founder of the Voice of Youth Advocates, which was a 40-year mainstay in advocating intellectual freedom for young people [Bernier, A., (2013). The wit and wisdom of Dorothy M. Broderick: The VOYA editorials and more. Bowie, MD. Kurdyla Publishing.]
I am not a 17 year-old boy.
Yet that fact has not prevented me from studying, critiquing, writing about, and teaching the institutional anti-youth antagonism of library history.
Professor Wiegand is not black. But that did not prevent him from producing a series of highly regarded history monographs documenting the profession's complicity in institutional and professional racism – which, by the way, is also as much about whiteness as anything.
The Libraries: Culture, History, and Society current notion that intellectual and scholarly rigor is incapable of contributing to historiographic analysis, based entirely on identity, is ridiculous and dangerous.
The defense of historical analysis rooted in primary sources, historiographic debate, and the critical application of scholarly methods does not, however, obviate the need for nor the value of professionals sharing stories about experience and practice. Both contribute value to our understanding and appreciation of library history. But they contribute different things as I argued in an article I published in the journal's 7th volume. [September 2023). LHRT's two communities. Libraries: Culture, History, and Society 7, no. 2., pages 176-180.]
If the journal is to survive it must not revere and celebrate one approach while devaluing the other.
~Anthony Bernier, Professor, San Jose State University
------------------------------
Anthony Bernier
Professor
San Jose State University
------------------------------