Universal Accessibility Interest Group

last person joined: yesterday 

Charge: Offers librarians, support staff, students, and other advocates networking and collaboration opportunities, information sharing and programming to promote accessibility in academic libraries, including web accessibility, assistive technology, reference and instruction for users with disabilities and captioning processes.
Community members can post as a new Discussion or email ALA-acrluaig@ConnectedCommunity.org
Before you post: please note job postings are prohibited on ALA Connect. Please see the Code of Conduct for more information.

Software Accessibility Suit

  • 1.  Software Accessibility Suit

    Posted May 18, 2015 04:04 PM

    FYI, courtesy of Adina Mulliken.


    Emphasis in bold was added by me.


    Best,


    John


    -----------------------------------


    *Software Accessibility Suit*

    May 14, 2015


    *By*

    Carl Straumsheim <https://www.insidehighered.com/users/carl-straumsheim>


    The U.S. Department of Justice is seeking to join a blind student?s lawsuit
    against Miami University in Ohio, saying the institution?s website and
    licensed software from vendors such as from Turnitin and Pearson are
    inaccessible to students with disabilities.

    Aleeha Dudley, who is blind, sued the university and its president in
    January 2014, alleging it violated Title II of the Americans With
    Disabilities Act of 1990. The law requires state entities such as public
    universities to provide equal access to students with disabilities.

    Dudley enrolled at the university in 2011 to study zoology, but says her
    grades suffered because of "Miami's selection of software programs that
    gratuitously exclude[d]" her from equal access to accessible course
    materials, according to the complaint. Examples include digitized textbooks
    described as "nearly useless and vastly inferior to the printed text,
    software not designed to be used with screen readers, and 'unusable'
    tactile graphics."

    The department launched an investigation of the university in April 2014.
    Its findings, released that June, suggested the university had violated the
    ADA. The department has since attempted to resolve the case, but on Tuesday
    moved <http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-moves-intervene-disability-discrimination-lawsuit-alleging-miami> to intervene.

    The department will sometimes file a statement of interest in a case,
    explaining a specific matter without taking a formal position. If the
    department's motion to intervene is granted, however, it would join Dudley
    in suing the university. The case is filed in a federal district court in
    Ohio.

    "We are pleased that the DOJ is taking this case and the issues that it
    presents so seriously," said Chris Danielsen, director of public relations
    for the National Federation of the Blind. The organization is assisting
    Dudley in the case.

    The university in a statement said it continues to deny the allegations.
    "We take our obligations under the American Disabilities Act very seriously.
    Miami provides extensive resources and accommodations for our disabled
    students, and will continue to do so."

    Miami is the latest university to draw scrutiny from the federal government
    over its use of technology in the classroom. In 2013
    <https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/07/26/settlements-put-colleges-duty-ensure-blind-students-access-materials-under-new>, the department reached a settlement with Louisiana Tech University over an issue that also involved students with vision impairments. Last month <https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2015/04/03/justice-department-edx-reach-settlement>, the department settled a case with massive open online course provider edX, which committed to making its platform accessible to users with disabilities.

    While the list of colleges and universities finding themselves in legal
    trouble over accessibility issues continues to grow, advocates for students
    with disabilities said they continue to wonder how many examples are needed
    before it becomes a high-priority issue in higher education.

    "The macro problem here that we're currently having to address, sort of
    university by university, is that the technology and content providers are
    not doing what they need to do to make their stuff accessible," Danielsen
    said. Currently the only mechanism that we have to address this is to go
    after the colleges and universities, because they are the ones with the
    buying power. They are the ones that can say, if they will, to a provider
    that we will not purchase, we will not deploy your product if it's not
    accessible."

    The organization is working with institutions and vendors to determine
    which regulations both sides can agree on, Danielsen said.

    The ADA covers colleges and universities, but not their software vendors,
    said Daniel F. Goldstein, a lawyer who specializes in disability rights
    law. He pointed out that institutions can influence the market by requiring
    companies that respond to requests for proposals to detail how they will
    make their software accessible to students with disabilities.


    Accessibility becomes a competitive edge once there's a tipping point of
    enough schools saying, 'excuse me, but is your software accessible???'
    Goldstein, who also serves as counsel for the National Federation of the
    Blind, said. "To get this fixed, it's going to need college and university
    presidents saying this matters."

    The department's proposed complaint lists a number of vendors whose
    software it found to be inaccessible. In addition to the university's
    website, video platforms Vimeo and YouTube, and word processor Google Docs,
    the complaint also lists course work management software from LearnSmart,
    Pearson, Sapling, Turnitin, Vista Higher Learning and WebAssign.
    The
    companies have contracts with many colleges and universities, so it is
    unlikely that Miami is using products not broadly found in higher education.

    The companies did not respond or were unable to respond to requests for
    comment Wednesday evening.