Warning message

ALA Connect User logins are disabled for a temporary "gray-out" period, to prevent new posts while we upgrade into the New Connect. This gray-out period will begin on March 26th, and the new site will be launched on April 25th.

Users can use Search to view public content. Logins will be reinstated and users can create new posts, upload files, etc. post launch.

Thank you for your patience in cooperation. Check out training resources and schedule at:
http://www.ala.org/support/alaconnect

Or contact Julianna Kloeppel for training or Pam Akins with questions/concerns.
Go to:
Discussion
Online Doc
File
Poll
Event
Meeting Request
Suggestion
ALAConnect Helpdesk (staff)'s picture

Catalog Use Committee Discussion Forum

When: 
Saturday, June 23, 2012
4:00 pm to 5:30 pm
Colleen Seale's picture

Roundtable Discussion
Catalog Use Committee

 

The Catalog Use Committee hosted a Roundtable Discussion at ALA Annual in Anaheim.  The group had planned out five distinct discussion topics for the meeting, with a moderator for each topic.

  • Finding e-Resources: an idea sparked by this article in the September issue of the Journal of Academic Librarianship, “Usability Testing for E-Resource Discovery: How Students Find and Choose E-Resources Using Websites.” (p. 386 Fry, Amy).
  • Catalog Accessibility: Access issues confronted by marginalized user groups such as the elderly, the disabled and children.
  • Open Source Systems: Are they the future or a distraction?
  • New Technology and the Mobile Landscape: How to make sense of new technology, platforms and devices.
  • New Cataloging Standards and Resource Discovery: How will the new Sears subject headings and the RDA (Resource Description and Access) standards impact librarians and library users?

The Roundtable was scheduled for 4:00 p.m. on Saturday evening, and this may have impacted attendance.  In the end, we had a dozen attendees and decided to meet together as one group.  The smaller size of the group really helped draw in all of the participants.  We had a very lively discussion, touching on each of the topic areas.  We were able to devote more time to areas of particular interest to the group.  The evaluations from the session were quite positive, with ¾ rating the “overall experience” as “Very Good” and ¼ rating it as “Excellent”.