Go to:
Discussion
Online Doc
File
Poll
Event
Meeting Request
Suggestion
Peter Hepburn's picture

Educational Requirements for Executive Director

Council:

 

As you know, ALA Executive Director (ED) Keith Fiels is retiring in July 2017, and the Executive Board is developing a selection process for the ED search.  This review involves, among other things, an assessment of the organizational information related to ALA recruitment and hiring, a discussion of position requirements, and preferences for education and experience with Board as well as a scan of ALA’s contemporary hiring practices.

 

Recognizing that Council is the governing body of ALA and recognizing that there is a variety of opinion about the ALA-accredited degree requirement, the Executive Board would like to expand the conversation of whether or not the degree should be required for the Executive Director position.  Attached is a draft resolution, presented without prejudice, to open the conversation.  The draft resolution presents a single resolved clause that amends existing policy, making the degree preferred.  The test of the draft resolution is pasted below as well.

 

A second document is attached titled “Educational Requirements for Future ALA Executive Directors Required ALA-Masters -Pros and Cons”.  This document is a collection of notes regarding input to date on the question of requiring or preferring the ALA-accredited degree.  It is provided as information for those who prefer to contemplate decisions in such a way.

 

The Executive Board welcomes the input of Council in the time before we convene at Midwinter to discuss and refine the resolution that we will ultimately present to Council next month.  Council is invited to post comments to this list and through ALA Connect.

 

Thank you,

Peter Hepburn, on behalf of the ALA Executive Board

Sara Dallas's picture

ALA is facing some interesting challenges internally and externally.  ALA needs to move forward and grow using the organization's strategic plan.  Looking at the gaps and needs, the new Executive Director should have the skill sets, knowledge and temperament to allow the organization to evolve.  I have confidence that the search committee will select the best candidate to administer ALA.  I recommend, the language MLS or MLIS preferred.

Nina Lindsay's picture

I appreciate Lisa Hinchliffe's comment and agree.  A statement to "recommend, but not require" the degree does not repudiate the values of our profession, or of the degree itself. Rather, it turns the focus to the skills, knowledge, and values that a candidate demonstrates for this very unique and critical position, still recommending the MLS.  I expect the Executive Director to demonstrate a commitment to the values and mission of ALA, and a deep understanding of and passion for libraries and their place in our democracy. While I imagine it is likely that the most qualified candidate will hold an MLS, I can also imagine candidates without the degree who still come "from within."

Nina Lindsay

2017-18 ALSC President

 

 

Rachel Crowley's picture

I believe that we can find a librarian who has the skills, knowledge, and values that we need. We have wonderful leaders/managers now.

James Rettig's picture

ALA has had effective executive directors with the MLS; it has also had less-than-effective executive directors with the MLS.  As Lisa Hinchliffe has articulated, ALA needs an ED committed to ALA values, etc.  I have known librarian who have the MLS who acted contrary to ALA's values, e.g. by refusing to have books in their collections that they disapprove of or to avoid community controversy.  What matters is how an individual, with or sans MLS, has demonstrably embraced those values through action and public statements.

Managing an organization as complex as ALA and facing the challenges it has faced in recent years (e.g., declining membership, revenue channels less reliable than in the past) requires knowledge, experience, and insight that MLS programs do not necessarily impart. 

The Executive Board has responsibility to hire the best candidate it can find to serve as our next ED.  It needs the freedom, and the trust of the membership, to conduct a search that will facilitate that process.  It needs to be able to consider candidates who have the experience, knowledge, and commitment to ALA's core values, whether or not they have developed those in part from earning an MLS. The proposal to remove the MLS requirement, but retain it is a preferred experience factor, will give the EB that freedom.

Jim Rettig

Former member of the Executive Board and ALA president 2008-09

ALA needs an ED who is committed to the values, mission, purposes, etc., of libraries and ALA - See more at: http://connect.ala.org/comment/84592#comment-84592
ALA needs an ED who is committed to the values, mission, purposes, etc., of libraries and ALA - See more at: http://connect.ala.org/comment/84592#comment-84592
ALA needs an ED who is committed to the values, mission, purposes, etc., of libraries and ALA - See more at: http://connect.ala.org/comment/84592#comment-84592

Jim Rettig

Retired Academic Library Administrator

Happily living in Williamsburg, Virgina

jimrettig.gm@gmail.com

Paul Bond's picture

Our leader needs to be one of us. I understand and appreciate the reasons for supporting a change, but the degree isn't exactly a high bar. It's just one of several baseline requirements for such a position.

 

Colleen Harris-Keith (non-member)'s picture

If many different kinds of people in various professions will be qualified, then I don't understand the argument for *not* requiring the MLS as a factor to narrow down candidates. if we require an ALA-accredited MLS to work a service desk and represent our institutions, surely we can require one for a position that will be running our professional organization and serving all of us? Surely with an abundance of possibilities, narrowing down to those who think so much of libraries and their values that theyve been trained in the actual work of libraries should be seen as incredibly valuable?

If the MLS is unnecessary as an indicator of dedication to the profession and its values and work, then why don't we just all agree that you can have whatever degree, or none, and we can just train you on the job, not just for this position, but all positions in libraries? It's yet another nod toward the idea that the MLS is worth little to nothing to libraries as institutions, and to the profession. If that's the case, then let's be honest that it's just a money-maker degree for higher ed and stop pretending that you need the union card to have the skills necessary to do the work and hold the values. 

A big thank you to Mr. LaFleur who notes above that The Board of the Association of College and Research Libraries discussed this issue and supports the continued requirement that the ALA Executive Director hold an MLS degree. 

----

Colleen S. Harris

Information Literacy Coordinator

CSU Channel Islands

 

Melora Norman's picture

The only people who can thoroughly understand and support this profession are those who have acquired the appropriate professional qualifications.  There are a great many highly-qualified, intelligent and capable people who have this requirement and who could perform the job admirably; arguments asserting that we need to enlarge the pool of candidates are completely unconvincing and without evidence to support them.  The only way that I could support removing the requirement would be if the profession decides to morph considerably, for instance to merge with some other profession such as computer science.  Otherwise I think it is extremely inappropriate to consider further weakening of support for the accredited MLS which is still at this moment a cornerstone of the profession.  If we as a profession no longer believe that the MLS is important then let us begin discussions regarding what defines us and who we are.  Otherwise, please ensure that we hire one of the great many competent and capable qualified librarians in our midst to lead us.

Faye Roberts's picture

I’m a former Executive Director of a state library association. I have an MLIS degree and more than 20 years’ experience working in libraries. While I appreciate the arguments for requiring ALA’s Executive Director to have a degree in library science, I think that making this requirement mandatory could shortchange the association by eliminating other, better qualified candidates from consideration.

A library science degree can provide an excellent overview of challenges facing the profession.  Similarly, library employment can bring an understanding of what is involved in working in a library setting. On the other hand, most library education programs and few library jobs prepare one to run a not-for-profit association, especially not one as large and diverse as ALA.

Guiding a not-for-profit association requires different knowledge and skills from those needed to run most libraries. Serving as Executive Director of a very large, national organization requires administrative ability that only some librarians have the opportunity to develop. The elected leadership and staff of ALA and its subdivisions comprise a world of experience in all facets of the library profession; no one ED candidate can hope to possess such a range of knowledge. And why would she or he need to possess that knowledge when it’s already available elsewhere in the organization?

ALA’s next Executive Director should be the most qualified individual who has a proven track record in the management of large membership associations and who can support the values of our profession. If this person also has an MLIS degree, that’s even better. 

Lisa Hinchliffe's picture

I was revisiting this today and realized that the current policy is an MLS or an NCATE. What's the rationale for dropping the NCATE completely? It wouldn't even be one of the preferred? 

Peter Hepburn's picture

Lisa, thank you for the excellent question.  I will be sure that the Executive Board is aware of it, especially in case we need to revise the resolution draft before it comes to the floor at Council.

Thanks!

Peter

Lisa Hinchliffe's picture

Thanks Peter. I think this is a critical clarification because a lot of the arguments I'm seeing are about affirming the MLS as THE degree for the ED because ALA accredits it - I think because of the resolution as stated only allowing for the MLS. But, if the policy stays as is, the MLS is not affirmed as THE degree but rather one of the degrees. The pro-con grid doesn't engage this either.  So, ultimately people who are arguing to keep the MLS as the required degree may be frustrated to discover that the policy as stands isn't an exclusive affirmation of the MLS. 

Carrie Fishner's picture

I firmly believe that as an organization, we cannot have an ED of the American Library Association who is not a LIBRARIAN. Yes, other skills are necessary to direct such a large and diverse organization, but at the heart of the organization is Libraries. To fully understand and honor that, the ED must come from there. 

Jeremy Johannesen's picture

This conversation hits close to home.  For the past four years I have had the privilege of serving as the Executive Director of the New York Library Association (NYLA).  NYLA is one of the five largest state chapters in the nation, with over 5K members, representing all library types.  Prior to becoming executive director, I severed as deputy director for three years.  All totaled, I have over a decade of experience working in professional membership organizations.

Since I have assumed the executive director's position, NYLA membership has increased by over 25%, and NYS Library Aid Funding has increased by over $15M.

I passionately believe in the core values of librarianship, and have built a career around empowering members of the library community to connect, share and advocate for libraries.

All that being said - I do not hold my MLS.  I don't believe for a moment that I am qualified to run a library.  I do believe that my record of success demonstrates that an association professional without an MLS has the capacity to effectively run a library association.

A hard-line requirement for any specific degree may exclude truly viable candidates.

Scott Walter's picture

I have taught for the past 15 years in MLS programs at San Jose, Illinois, and Dominican, so my comments regarding the requirement are grounded in my experience as an MLS-holder, an LIS educator, a supervisor of MLS students, and someone who has been able to hire dozens of librarians over the years (where some positions required the ALA-accredited degree and others did not).

I have also taught for the past 4 years in the M.A. in Nonprofit Management program at DePaul University, so my comments regarding the requirement are likewise grounded in my experience of the fact that non-profit management is also a credentialed field that, like librarianship, involves a commitment to a core set of professional values as well as core competence in areas of critical concern to Association management.

My thinking about this requirement has also been shaped in recent weeks by the debate over the ongoing commitment of the Association to the core values of the profession engendered by a series of press releases issued by the Association since the November election in the U.S. In this regard, I have been thinking about the complementary roles of the Executive Director, the ALA President, and the other elected members of the ALA Executive Committee in ensuring a values-centered approach to ALA leadership (where "value" is understood as the commitment to certain shared beliefs about the role of libraries and librarians and library staff in society, and not solely in the bottom line).

With those caveats:

1) I believe that there are certain core competencies required in this position in regard to its responsibility for administrative leadership of the Association, stewarding Association resources, committing to professional development and support for the Association's staff, etc., and that these competencies are not tied to the completion of an ALA-accredited degree (which includes degrees other than the MLS, of course). These may be found in those who have completed degrees in Nonprofit Management, for example, or who have served in leadership positions in libraries, other cultural heritage organizations, other nonprofits, or other Associations

2) I believe that it is absolutely critical in today's environment that the ED be able to demonstrate his or her commitment to the core values of the LIS professions. This commitment seems to be what many assume may be assessed, by proxy, through the possession of the MLS degree, but I do not believe that assumption is wholly accurate. There are many who have shown their commitment to the values we embrace through their work, inside and outside of cultural heritage organizations, who do not hold the professional degree. And, there are those who hold the professional degree who I might question in terms of what values actually guide their decisions as librarians and as leaders.

3) I believe it is critical that the Executive Director, sharing a commitment to our values, understands how to best make use of the professional expertise represented by the elected leadership of the Association, including the President and President-Elect, of course, but expanding to other elected leaders at the Executive Board, Divisional, and Chapter levels. For many, a gap seems to have opened up between "Big ALA" and the work they are doing to advance our profession and our shared values at the local, state, and other levels. A new ED should commit to a deeper engagement with the professional leadership in shaping his or her work in administrative leadership.

4) I note that ALA is a professional association, and not a library, itself. Thus, my comments regarding educational requirements for leadership positions in a professional association should not be assumed to reflect my thinking about educational requirements for the position of library director (we can have a side discussion regarding what I think about trends in librarianship and in higher education, more broadly, regarding the recruitment of senior leaders from outside the fields represented by the organizations they have been recruited to lead)

If those commitments are the ones guiding the selection of the next Executive Director, we can craft a much more strategic and meaningful recruitment effort than one where so much is assumed through one's possession (or not) of the MLS (or other ALA-accredited degree). Rather than depend on the degree as proxy, let's search for the skills, values, and commitment to professional engagement (and respect for professional expertise) that we need. There are many excellent librarians who might fit this bill, but there are also many excellent Association professionals who are not librarians; I'd advocate allowing as many excellent candidates into the pool as we can, and then focusing on finding the one who has the best combination of core competencies, values, and commitment to collaboration. 

So, the short answer for the tally: I recommend making the MLS (or ALA-accredited degree) no more than a preferred educational requirement, but I could even see an argument (in the context of a very well-written position announcement) for making it a desired requirement.

Scott Walter, M.L.S., Ph.D.
University Librarian
DePaul University

Rachel Rubin's picture

I had a wonderful conversation about this last week with a colleague. She and I disagree (I think the MLS should be required for the E.D., she does not.) We wondered if some of the issues with the requirement could be resolved with more flexible language. Doing this would not address the crux of the important conversation we are having, but it may allow us to move forward with a compromise. (Suggestion in italics.)

"Required Qualifications: A Master’s Degree from a program accredited by the ALA, OR a Master’s Degree with a specialty in school library media from an educational unit accredited by the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE), OR an equivalent combination of knowledge, education, skills, and experience."  

This would require trust in the search committee to identify what, if any, alternative experience would truly equate to what we expect from a degree-holder. It also means that we very clearly would have to define what we are looking for in an ED.  I know this suggestion is not a solution, and it is a lot to ask of the search committee,  but it might be worth considering.

Take care, all.

Rachel 

 

 

Peter Hepburn's picture

Rachel, thanks for this message.  Between this and what Lisa Hinchliffe had to say about the NCATE, as well as other comments, I feel certain the Executive Board will be discussing how to revise and refine the resolution for presentation to Council in Atlanta.  Thanks, and Happy New Year!

Peter

Diane Chen's picture

During the fall AASL Executive Committee meeting and during our December AASL Board call, we decided to support requiring a “Master’s Degree from a program accredited by the ALA or a Master’s Degree with a specialty in school library media from an educational unit accredited by the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) for the Executive Director of ALA.”

We believe it is essential for the executivedirector of the American Library Association to have the educational training and degree in the field.  This educational background and degreewas also valued when choosing the new Librarian of Congress this year.  Having an MLS does not prevent any candidate from also having managerial and association management experience.

Respectfully, Diane R ChenAASL Division Councilor Sent from my iPhone



This is an automatic message from ALA Connect.

Manage your ALA Connect notifications in your Connect profile.

Get help in the ALA Connect Help Community.

View original post: http://connect.ala.org/mcomment/redirect/%3C16206.261265.0.1481902120.78146ff2e0f0f220f5fb3eb06b29c7aa%40connect.ala.org%3E

Diane R. Chen

School Librarian, Stratford STEM Magnet School, Nashville, TN

Melora Norman's picture

Peter has encouraged me to share my view that the existence of other (non-degreed) points of view built into the system actually provides excellent support for why we should continue to ensure that our ED does have one, bringing the experience and vision that only a person who has worked through the process can share.  Arguably support for the degree has been dwindling to the extent that it seems almost preferred at times to hire non-degreed candidates, thereby limiting opportunities for people who have worked hard to get the degree that we propound as central to defining us as professionals and further lessening any case to be made for any employer to require the degree for any library-related position anywhere.

If the ALA-accredited degree is not producing fantastic library leaders perfectly poised to lead the Association, we should immediately begin asking ourselves why not.  If it is the case, then our best pool of candidates lies within what in my experience is a really fantastic, large and highly-qualified group of accredited degree holders.

Simply enlarging the field so as to include a "larger pool" seems like an extremely weak and unconvincing reason to change the requirement for a job. Is it typical for lawyers to welcome non-lawyers into the leadership positions of their associations? There are, as others have pointed out, myriad opportunities for non-degreed people to get involved with ALA.  If we value the ALA accreditation process, why would we even consider not taking an opportunity to actively prove our commitment?

Chris Corrigan's picture

I respectfully disagree with the argument that you need an MLS to fully care about libraries and the function they serve. I further disagree with the premises that having a business background means you won't have our interests at heart. Andrew Carnegie didn't have an MLS, but his passion for public libraries are why there are so many in cities large and small today.

Felton Thomas's picture

Dear Peter,

 

Thank you for sharing the draft resolution on education requirements of future ALA executive directors. The PLA Board discussed this matter at our fall board meeting and was unanimous in agreeing that the ALA-accredited MLIS degree requirement be changed to recommended from required. PLA supports the YALSA statement that “an MLIS be recommended, but not required, in the job requirement for the next ALA CEO; that the applicant be able to demonstrate familiarity with the current library landscape and its values; and that relevant nonprofit and/or association credentials (such as the Certified Association Executive) be strongly considered.”

Draft minutes (to be approved at Midwinter) from our PLA Board meeting follow:

“The board agreed that the requirement for the position be MLIS recommended not required. The PLA Board sees great value in casting the widest net possible to attract the absolute highest quality candidates to lead positive change and to help resolve significant challenges for ALA and for libraries. Specifically, the PLA Board looks for these competencies in the new ALA ED:

 

Leadership

The ideal candidate will demonstrate skill leading complex organizations through periods of change and growth, as indicated by competency in:

--Strategic vision

--Deep understanding of core library values and library advocacy

--Change facilitation

 

Management

In addition to understanding and trusting the work of all ALA units, the ideal candidate will demonstrate high-level management competencies in:

--Association operations, governance, and structure

--Strategic planning

--Development, policy, and advocacy

 

Personal

To ensure a successful transition to new leadership, the ideal candidate will demonstrate personal competencies in:

--Building and motivating internal teams

--Building sustainable partnerships inside and outside the association

--Clear and consistent communications”

As YALSA eloquently states, talented, mission-driven nonprofit leaders will want to be part of our organization because they value libraries and the great work we do. The pool of qualified candidates should not be limited. While ALA represents libraries, ALA is not a library. The Board of Directors and Council are composed of librarians, who work in strong partnership with the Executive Director and other staff to ensure the highest commitment to our core values, to our members and to libraries more generally, and to advocacy on behalf of libraries. The position of ALA ED calls for an individual with the commitment, knowledge and skills to move our complex association forward at a critical moment in time. Let’s seek out all the opportunities available to us to find that leader.

LeRoy LaFleur's picture

As an ALA member, my personal opinion on this matter is that strongly preferring rather than requiring the MLS/MLIS is sufficient for the ALA Executive Director position.

That said, I am curious about the context in which the original 2000 Midwinter-San Antonio resolution requiring the MLS was made.  It strikes me as odd that we should be considering overturning a resolution that was seemingly made to address this exact situation, and which ostensibly yielded Fiels, shortly after it's adoption.  I assume there are still some folks who were around during the debate on the 2000 resolution? 

Doug Archer's picture

Yesterday, on "Here and Now" I heard NPR's Lisa Mullins interviewing Curt Nickisch, Senior Editor of the Harvard Business Review ( http://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2017/01/05/boss-do-your-job ).

The topic was "If Your Boss Could Do Your Job, You’re More Likely to Be Happy at Work."  Nickisch described a recent study that showed that coders whose managers can actually code and, therefore, know the problems faced by their employees, were more satisfied in their work than those whose managers could not code.  Nickisch then referred to an earlier study that found that hospitals administered by physicians significantly out performed hospitals led by non-physicians in national quality of service assessments.  See Amanda H. Goodall's "Physician-leaders and hospital performance: Is there an association?"  Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 73, Issue 4, August 2011, pp 535–539.

The message I took from this was that sharing the experience of the people one manages is crucial for effective leadership.  Therefore, while an MLS is certainly a very strong indicator of commitment to librarianship and its values, significant successful experience as a librarian AND similar experience as an administrator are the essential qualifications for ALA's Executive Director not the degree per se.  A candidate with an MLS but without a strong track record as a librarian wouldn't qualify for our position just as a person without an MLS but with successful work as a librarian (someone who came up through the ranks so to speak) most definitely could.

If the requirement is to be changed, I hope that any new wording will stress the equal importance of successful library and successful administrative experience.  "Strongly preferred" doesn't quite do it but I have yet to come up with a better suggestion.   Perhaps adding text such as "the successful candidate must have demonstrated significant, successful library experience AND significant, successful administrative experience" would work.

 

J. Douglas Archer Reference & Peace Studies Librarian 246 Hesburgh Library University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, IN 46556 574-631-6656 voice | 574-631-8887 fax archer.1@nd.edu | www.nd.edu/~jarcher

Pauline Manaka (non-member)'s picture

MLS is an important requirement, I agree for all the stated reasons but also because I believe that the education/training of librarians is continuing to evolve to meet 21st century expectations of library leaders in society.

Susan Dillinger's picture

I have been a member of ALA for more years than I care to count.  As our national professional organization that actually accredits the university degrees programs why would we not require the MLS for the head of our organization.  If we do not set the example it will only lead to more "professional" positions at the local level lowering their requirements for the MLS.  We have already begun to see this.  How can ALA advocate for keeping the MLS as a requirement at the local level when they won't require it at the national for our leader.  Thank goodness we finally have a MLS librarian at the helm of the Library of Congress.  Please adjust your requirements so that the MLS is required not preferred.

Kayla Kuni's picture

This is an interesting discussion, but my opinion is it should stay MLIS required (not preferred). 

John DeSantis's picture

I'm gratified to see comments in support of retaining the MLS degree for this position.  Some of you know that Council overturned this requirement a couple weeks ago.  There is currently a member initiative petition designed to make this a ballot question on next year's ballot, in hopes of reversing Council's action.  If you support the retention of the MLS degree for the Executive Director, please sign our petition:
 https://tinyurl.com/ybyqpyw7

 

Patricia Hogan's picture

I think it is important to realize that some of the members may believe that if ALA does not value the degree, then why should people value the Association.  I recognize that it has been difficult to find the candidate that is needed but there is a tone , almost an attitude, that would suggest ALA thinks librarians cannot run an association.  I have heard from people who feel betrayed and who are proud of their experience and education.  These aspects were not something that people foresaw as they discussed the role of Executive Director, but a lot of members are concerned.  Just my thoughts based on conversations with different members from different types of libraries.  Pat Hogan, Councilor for Smaller Roundtables

Virus-free. www.avg.com


On Mo

Wendy Stephens's picture

I see requiring a minimum professional background as a major distinction between a organization which attempts to grapple with professional ethics and philosophical concerns versus a mere membership organization of limited scope or utility to its constituents. And I can tell you that the membership and conference investment in the American Library Association represents a financial commitment on the part of individual members and their employers that will definitely be eroded if that leadership has more experience with organizations than with libraries.

I also believe that the talent pool within our profession exists to support this critical role, but that the ED job description was actually antithetical to our professional ethos. Isn't that insistence on entrepreneurship potentially off-putting for professionals who have devoted their lives to public service and a public good?

Cesar Caballero's picture

I totally agree with Michael Gorman.  The Executive Director of ALA should hold an MLIS and have substantial amounts of experience running large and complax organizations.  This questions is similar to the question:  Should directors or Deans of libraries hold an MLIS?  The answer has been and should continue to be:  of course!

Cesar Caballero, Member of the Executive Board, 1992-1996

Cesar Caballero

Dean and University Librarian

Pfau Library

Cal State San Bernardino

John DeSantis's picture

Thank you, Cesar!  Please sign the petition aimed at restoring the MLS requirement for this position if you haven't already done so:
     https://tinyurl.com/ybyqpyw7

 

Stanton Biddle's picture

Listing the MLS as a preference leaves too much room for interpretation.  The Executive Director of our profession's organization should, first of all be a member or our profession.  If we cannot find someone from within our ranks who can appreciate, understand, articulate, and offer solutions to issues confronting this organization there is something wrong with our own recruitment, training and professional development.     

John DeSantis's picture

Thank you, Stanton! Please consider signing this petition aimed at restoring the MLS requirement:

   https://tinyurl.com/ybyqpyw7

Loretta Parham's picture

I certainly understand the rationale provided for maintaining the requirement of a graduate degree in library and information science for the ALA Exec Director.  But I too, favor a change.  Our association needs to make some changes, and to do so we really need an articulate and experienced "career" association leader and manager. The changes that ALA will want to make in order to remain relevant to the membership, policy makers and to community will certainly benefit by the solicited and volunteered opinions, knowledge and values of the tens of thousands of librarians paying membership dues annually.  Our challenges are organizational, fiscal, strategic and heavily tied to a new dynamic for defining the benefits of membership.  This lesson is not taught in library or information schools.

I think a candidate that is a strong advocate for libraries can be found.  Afterall we work everyday to develop library advocates in our interactions in public, school, special and academic libraries.   Some of our "Friends" are very true to the profession and hold dear our values and our passion for intellectual freedom and scholarship.

I would like us to untie ALA leadership's hands and challenge them to find a suitable and best candidate to operate the association, MLS preferred. 

 

 Disclaimer:  I am a former member of the ACRL Board. 

Loretta Parham

CEO & Director, Atlanta University Center Woodruff Library

Adele Fasick's picture

As a long time member of ALA, and a former member of the ALSC Board, I was very proud to see that we finally have an accredited librarian as the new Librarian of Congress.  I think that our association also ought to have a professional librarian with an MLS as its Executive Director.

Adele Fasick

Professor Emerita, University of Toronto 

Rivkah Sass's picture

Hi Everyone,

I’m confused. I was under the impression that we voted and something like 77% agreed that we would add the word “preferred.” While I am very proud of my MLS (I’m
old so the “I” isn’t there), I believe we discussed and approved the idea that we need the very best person for this critical job for our organization. Maybe we’ll get lucky and someone with an MLIS will emerge but in the meantime, this allows us to move forward.

I think we’re being pragmatic here and I believe we need to allow the process to work. I’m not sure this I worth the effort of a “do over” quite yet. Why not
see what emerges and in the meantime use our righteous indignation to address our other battles. There are so many other important issues for us to be passionate about, e.g. net neutrality, I hate to see us get entangled with this discussion.

Regards,

Rivkah (LLAMA Councilor)

Rivkah K. Sass | Executive Director

Sacramento Public Library

V:  916.264.2830 M: 916.719.9318

rsass@saclibrary.org

Raising a reader is:

Talking
l
Singing
l
Reading
l
Writing
l
Playing

om: ALA Connect [mailto:connect@ala.org]

Sent: Monday,

Stephanie Chase's picture

Very well put Rivkah -- thank you!

John DeSantis's picture

Professor Fasick- it was very gratifying for me to read your comments. I was one of your students at FLIS many years ago when you were the Dean. 

   Please consider signing our petition aimed at restoring the MLS requirement 

  https://tinyurl.com/ybyqpyw7

My very best wishes to you,

  John DeSantis

Patricia Schuman's picture

 

The ALA Council email vote eliminating the library degree requirement for the Executive Director may technically be legal, but it is a highly unusual process and ( i believe) ill- advised. I do not recall a Council vote 
( electronic or mail) overturning such a controversial issue ever taking place. When I first became an ALA member ( in the dark ages of the sixties) Council and most committee meetings were closed. We young rebels won a hard fought battle for open meetings so that members could hear discussion and talk with their representatives. We also fought back a move to severely limit Membership's ability to overturn Council actions. Fortunately, Membership still has the ability to overturn this recent action— or at the least call for further examination and discussions. I have been a member of Council, the Executive Board, the Treasurer of ALA and the ALA President. I worked hard along with colleagues to maintain and enhance ALA's democratic values and to promote the value of librarians to our publics. I am deeply disappointed by both the perversion of our democratic process and the devaluation of our professional credential.

Having served ALA in many capacities i know that the ED is considered THE most important librarian in the world.

Please sign the petition calling for a Membership vote.

https:/tinyurl.com/ybyqpyw7

 

Patricia Glass Schuman

ALA Honorary Member

Past ALA President

Past ALA Treasurer

Founder, Library Advocacy Now!

MSLS, Columbia University

 

 

 

James Neal's picture

The option for electronic ballot by Council was approved by the membership and a threshold of75 percent was established to endorse an action. In this case, the search committee, the executive board and all of the divisions, as well as many individual members called for an online discussion and an electronic vote to consider the educational requirements for the ALA executive director. Therewas an extended period for debate, and a full week for voting. We may have different views onthe mandatory or preferred MLS for the ED,but the Council process was open, transparent,and fair. To accuse people of being undemocratic  or somehow unscrupulous is just not right. We are all colleagues trying to do what is best for the Association. We will proceed through the petition process and the member ballot, and thenwe will resume the recruitment and appointment ofan outstanding new ALA executive director. Sent from my iPhone


On Dec 5, 20

Patricia Schuman's picture

The option for membersip petition is also in the Constitution and Bylaws.  This is a healthy debate. Disagreement is not equivalent to disparagement. 

 

Melora Norman's picture

  • This conversation began in December 2016 and was followed by a Council vote defeating efforts to remove the degree requirement for the ALA Executive Director
  • After a relatively brief period and one quick review of a small number of candidates, the search committee asked for a new, electronic vote in another effort to drop the degree requirement for reasons that were not made clear.
  • Over a short period of a few weeks, Council held an electronic vote and reversed its decision
  • Many members were unaware that the decision had been reversed
  • The "we should widen the pool" arguments are unconvincing to members who believe that it is  vital for the Association to take this opportunity to re-affirm the value and importance of the degree for which it plays such a pivotal role
  • Arguments that "other associations" do not have practitioners are inaccurate: the AMA, the APA, the AHA, and the ABA all have eminently qualified professionals (doctors, historians, lawyers) at the helm of their associations
  • Members who feel strongly that the ALA ED position should be a role model representing an aspiration for members and the representation of the pinnacle of a prestigious library career want to be sure that all members realize these developments, consider the consequences, and have the opportunity guaranteed them by ALA policy to take action

Given these facts, please consider signing the petition so that members can have a voice.

http://www.ala.org/CFApps/epetition/index.cfm?pid=71D74CE98CC0D9E2

aka

https:/tinyurl.com/ybyqpyw7

 

 

Todd Krueger's picture

As members of ALA, we can agree to disagree about the need for an MLS for the position of ALA Executive Director, but to refer to the process as a perversion is beyond the pale of productive discourse. All of the discussions and debates both at Council meetings and online have been completely transparent and open to the membership.

When we talk about how highly unusual this process has been, we must also remember that the Search Committee along with the recruiter attempted to find suitable candidates that can fulfill the many needs of leading our organization. When that resulted in no candidates moving forward, this extraordinary step of an online Council vote was taken to open the candidate pool to a potentially more diverse group of people.  

My YALSA Board colleague Kate McNair said it very well: "ALA is in a fragile moment that can lead to a drop in funding and engagement for an association. We need to be decisive in selecting a leader to take us into the future." We must move forward, instead of constantly impeding the momentum of what could bring our association toward a better tomorrow. 

Thanks,

Todd Krueger, YALSA Division Councilor

Melora Norman's picture

I have heard from members who were unaware of the new discussion (which began on one message board and seemed to be moved elsewhere, or at least split, and was by no means as robust as the original thread).

Presumably the search committee can--if it wishes--continue to search for and interview candidates who do have the qualification even if the petition goes forward. Given the length of time that national searches sometimes take, this has been a relatively short search so far. What would the harm be in continuing to accept applications from candidates who do have the degree? I am sure that when people say we need someone who will "take us into the future," they don't intend to imply that the degree is a handicap, but some might interpret it that way. It is to be hoped that the outcome of the search proves how wrong that idea is. I have full confidence that an excellent candidate can, with a little more time, be found who has the qualification and who is also a fantastic, forward-thinking leader.

Please sign the petition so that members can weigh in on this matter and to ensure that they are all aware that for the first time in the Association's history, a regular vote of Council was overturned electronically less than a year after the vote on a matter that some of us consider vitally important.

http://www.ala.org/CFApps/epetition/index.cfm?pid=71D74CE98CC0D9E2

aka

https:/tinyurl.com/ybyqpyw7

Sara Dallas's picture

I am  greatly concerned about how this narrative is being framed - it presumes that the only way to maintain professional values is to sign the petition.  This negates all of the work that was done by the ALA Executive Board, ALA Search Committee, all of the ALA Divisions, and the ALA Councilors.  I would like to remind everyone that the ALA Code of Ethics states that we treat co-workers and other colleagues with respect, fairness and good faith.

One word was added to the announcement - the word preferred.  I advocate that we put our energy into encouraging people with the degree and qualifications to apply.  The Search Committee and the Executive Board did not ask for the vote in a capricious nor unethical manner.   Every Division endorsed the effort to add the word preferred to the description. I have fullest confidence in Courtney Young’s search committee, Jim Neal, the Executive Board and the ALA Councilors whom voted electronically. 

Sara Dallas

ALA Councilor at Large

Chair Committee on Professional Ethics

Librarian for over 40 years

Melora Norman's picture

With all due respect, the word "preferred" has only one function: to permit the consideration of candidates who do not have the degree. It is a major, not a minor change, and one that many members oppose.

Giving members a voice is a good thing--it is every bit as reasonable as Council's decision to vote. It is built into our policies because we believe in member voice. This does not by any means imply that anyone has done anything wrong.

Please sign the petition and give members a chance to weigh in on this important matter.

http://www.ala.org/CFApps/epetition/index.cfm?pid=71D74CE98CC0D9E2

aka

https:/tinyurl.com/ybyqpyw7

Kari Mitchell's picture

I agree with Sara's well written response.  The word "preferred" allows the pool to be bigger - therefore, a better chance of finding the right person for the position.  As a librarian and ALA member, I would like nothing more than someone with an MLIS to lead ALA.  But, the skills for librarians are vastly different than what is needed to lead a large and influential association with 50k members.

A strong effort was given with "required MLIS".  And, unfortunately, there was not one who was able to fulfill the needs of ALA.  I strongly feel that the first round of accepting applicants would of brought the best chance for a qualified individual with a MLIS.  

Kari Mitchell

ALA Councilor at Large

Committee on Legislation

DC Public Library

Karen Schneider's picture

I strongly endorse Jim Neal's comments. In this online vote--unprecented, but in a GOOD way--Councilors could participate in the vote regardless of their ability to attend a face-to-face meeting. I even followed the vote most without logging in to Connect--a quality of access like CSPAN, and unheard of for Council meetings, which require people to have the time, money, and management of their own work and life schedules to participate.

With an unheard-of level of participation and endorsement, and its digital equity, it was the most transparent, socially-just Council vote in the history of ALA. It's also how Council *should* be able to respond to issues when they are not gathered twice a year as a physical body.

I also have seen the vote characterized as "rushed." I recall very few Council votes where we had so much lead time to reflect and discuss an issue. Most (but not all) Council resolutions appear on our dockets in the week leading up to ALA (if not *during* ALA). In this case, Council had over a month before the formal discussion period opened; then had a week of discussion (if that were true at ALA, we'd fly home the following Friday, not that Tuesday); then had a week to vote (unlike f2f Council, where if you have a conflicting meeting when balloting is taking place, well, that's too bad).

You can object to the outcome of the election--reached after a search committee, one of the very best I have served on, did everything it could to recruit the right person to the job, asked for reconsideration--but to call this process undemocratic is factually inaccurate.

Other ALA units vote online through Connect, and for that matter meet online. There is value to face-to-face deliberation, but we flogged this one to death last January face-to-face and had a narrow outcome. The real issue is that people feel very strongly about the MLS requirement. I do too. I once felt strongly in FAVOR of it (which is how I voted in 2000) but by 2016 I had to write Lois-Ann to ask her how I voted back then because through experience I had long since acquired an appreciation for the many OTHER specializations that bring value to libraries, such as fundraising, accounting, and yes, association management. How ironic that we should apply the same fallacy about association management that we too frequently confront for librarianship!

Oh, and because I get some good street rumors by way of ALA colleagues, let me assure everyone that the search committee worked hard, did not have a predetermined outcome (we would have LOVED to have declared victory), and had equal and full participation by all members.

If this vote was inappropriate, then a whole slew of decisions by ALA units need to be declared null and void. But let's be real, it's not 1899, we don't need to ride buggies to Chicago to deliberate (as this thread, ironically, makes obvious), and Council is capable of taking a vote on an issue in between face-to-face conferences. To me, that is progress TOWARD democracy. Invoking the bad old days, when ALA meetings were not open, only invites the question about how "open" our current processes truly are, and how well they serve ALA, its members, and librarianship.

Karen G. Schneider

 

Melora Norman's picture

Thanks for your always-engaging commentary, Karen.

As a member who isn't on Council now, it was only by coincidence that I happened on something that informed me Council was re-considering its vote. I'm sure it seems to councilors that you've been discussing this forever, but as Association actions go it was a pretty quick about-face. This is not a judgement, simply a statement regarding how these actions may have been experienced by members.

So on behalf of the members who care deeply about this issue, I ask that you please send the membership a message of support and consideration by signing the petition. We will be very grateful for the opportunity to weigh in on this directly in full accordance with ALA policy and procedure.

http://www.ala.org/CFApps/epetition/index.cfm?pid=71D74CE98CC0D9E2

aka

https:/tinyurl.com/ybyqpyw7

Sara Dallas's picture

I am posting this for Lauren Comito

Please remember that electronic voting is in the bylaws.  It had to be approved by the membership to even exist as an option.

Patricia Schuman's picture

Membership petitions are also in the Constitution and Bylaws. 

ALA is a membership organization. Leadership should welcome member participation and discussion. In my experience as ALA President, Treasurer, and Chair of many Committees, respectful disagreement is engagement that can lead to productive outcomes. This petition in no way halts the search process — it asks that membership have a say in this profound policy change.
 

 

Pages