ACRL STS (Science and Technology Section) Section
Elizabeth Wallace on Mon, 12/28/2015 - 11:02am
The Publisher/Vendor Relations Discussion Group of the ACRL Science & Technology Section invites you to join us at ALA Midwinter 2016 in Boston for:
The Rise of the Mega Journal: Is bigger better?
The mega journal: open access, peer-reviewed, and typically defined by a very large number of papers published compared to other scholarly journals. In recent years a number of commercial publishers, scholarly and professional societies, and university presses have branched out into this relatively new form of scholarly communication.
Please join us for a timely discussion on the origin of the mega journal, and where it fits within the larger publishing landscape. Participating on our panel:
Dr. Nandita Quaderi
Publishing Director, Open Research, Nature Publishing Group
Dr. Deborah Sweet
Editor and Publishing Director, Cell Press
Dr. Jason Wilde
Chief Publishing Officer, American Institute of Physics
Moderator: Scott Warren
Associate Dean for Research and Scholarship at Syracuse University Libraries
Sunday February 1st, 8:30am – 10:00am, Boston Convention and Exhibition Center, Room 156C
(Add to Midwinter Schedule)
The Publisher/Vendor Relations Discussion Group of the ACRL Science & Technology Section invites you to join us at ALA Midwinter 2015 in Chicago for:
Publishing and the Society
Sunday February 1st, 8:30am – 10:00am, McCormick Place West, W176a
(Add to Midwinter Scheduler)
Scholarly and professional societies play an essential role in STEM publishing and account for many of the world’s oldest academic publishing operations, predating most of their commercial counterparts. Please join us for a discussion of the unique role of the society publisher within the scholarly publishing environment, and the future challenges and opportunities they face.
Robert Harington, Associate Executive Director, Publishing, American Mathematical Society
Stephen Hawthorne, Executive Director, Publishing, Royal Society of Chemistry
Stephen Moss, Chief Operating Officer, IOP Publishing
Mary Warner, Assistant Director of Publications, American Geophysical Union
The panel moderator is Scott Warren, Interim Associate Dean for Research and Scholarship at Syracuse University Libraries.
The STS Liaisons Online Forum
Thursday, June 11, 2015, 3pm – 4pm EDT
(12pm – 1pm PDT; 1 pm – 2 pm MDT; 2pm – 3pm CDT)
The theme for the forum this year will be around the scholarly communication and data issues in the STEM organizations. During this free, hour-long virtual presentation, three liaisons who have recently attended meetings for their organizations will share the key activities in their liaising organizations in these areas. The liaisons will also discuss service opportunities and resources available to STS members in the different organizations. There will be time for questions, so come prepared to learn about the American Physical Society (APS), the American Chemical Society (ACS), and the American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS)!
There is no cost to attend this online forum. We hope to see you there!
Date: June 11, 2015
Time: 3pm – 4pm EDT
Forum URL (No Registration Required. Enter as a Guest): http://ala.adobeconnect.com/r75r78vyyqh/
Rachel Besara, Florida State University
STS Liaison to APS (http://www.aps.org/)
Rachel Besara is the Director of STEM Libraries & Research Initiatives at Florida State University, overseeing the Dirac Science Library and the FAMU-FSU College of Engineering Library. Her research interests include research faculty’s view of the research process & the library’s role in that process and evidence based practice. Previous to this position she was an Assessment Librarian at Florida State University.
Patti McCall, University of Central Florida
STS Liaison to ACS (http://www.acs.org/)
Patti McCall has been Science Librarian at the University of Central Florida (second largest university in student enrollment in the U.S. at 62,000 students) for three years. She is an active member of the Chemical Information Division of the American Chemical Society (ACS), ACRL, and is appointed as the STS Liaison to ACS from 2014 to 2016. Patti is also the organizer for Orlando’s Science Café.
Ginny Pannabecker, Virginia Tech
STS Liaison to AIBS (http://www.aibs.org)
Ginny Pannabecker is Life Science & Scholarly Communications Librarian at Virginia Tech where she works with departments in life and health sciences, and explores Scholarly Communication topics. She is a new member of, and STS liaison to the American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS). Ginny will share key points from an AIBS workshop on "Changing Practices in Data Publications," which took place in December 2014 and involved representatives from federal funding agencies; publishers and librarians; scientific societies and journals; and data services / providers.
Presented by the STS Liaisons Committee
STS maintains a liaison program to encourage STS members to report on the meetings and activities of science and technology organizations. Our liaisons have the important role of helping to develop connections between librarians and other STEM professionals.
Are you attending 2015 ALA Midwinter in Chicago? The attached STS Pocket Program will help you decide when and where to go.
STS Research Agenda Forum
2/1/15 from 3pm-4pm
Sheraton Chicago, Ballroom 8
Help the task force finalize the content for the agenda and make it useful for the membership.
Publishing and the Society - Panel Discussion
2/1/15 from 8:30am-10am
McCormick Place West W176a
Panelists from American Mathematical Society, Royal Society of Chemistry, IOP Publishing, and the American Geophysical Union discuss the unique role of the society publisher within the scholarly publishing environment and the future challenges they face.
Science Librarian Boot Camp Boot Camp
1/31/15 from 1pm-2:30pm
Sheraton Chicago Ballroom 8
What are these regional science boot camps? Do they include events like navigating an obstacle course in an unfamiliar library, making s'mores over burning piles of deaccessioned indexes, or building a fort out of old volumes of Chemical Abstracts to repel the campers from the other side of the lake? Hear from boot camp planners like Maxine Schmidt of the University Of Massachusetts Amherst, Margaret Mellinger of Oregon State University, and Tim Klassen of the University of Alberta talk about their experiences attending, planning, and running boot camps. The usual lively discussion will follow, exploring what you might get out of a boot camp, what you did at a boot camp, and what you might like to see at future boot camps.
See you in Chicago,
STS Publicity Officer (2014-2016)
Thanks so much to Spencer Davis for following our conversation and writing up the notes for us. We appreciate your work!
(Kathy Szigeti, facilitator)
The session flowed as a free flowing conversation with individuals asking questions that were relevant to them and then the rest of the group answered. These are an extrapolation of my notes and the recollections I have.
Topic 1 – Space in the Library
How does one justify getting new space in the library verses what fit on the shelves and what is appropriate? Also they need to make the case that they are a library and need advice on what to do and how to explain this to administration and others?
The amount of dollars that are paid into the collection wind up being a sizable investment. Those are concrete numbers that administrators and staff can see. Showing them where that money is going, into materials that then get weeded or outdated may show staff what they need.
Another way of phrasing the information.
If one considers information like food then one knows that food has a 'best buy' date on it. After a certain point it just goes bad.
One person spoke about the Renovation of the Carnegie Mellon libraries which wound up being not to the pleasure of the Dean and President. A potential solution on what to do with/in the Library can asked by the librarians: what do you want to do in the library space? Should there be more study rooms, more books, classrooms, computers? All people need to communicate what they want, what they would like to see done, and know that the others have heard them and are on the same page.
Another way of phrasing the information. Comic between waiter and guest with the guest complaining about the meat.
“What do you mean you ordered the prime rib, I wanted beef.”
“It is beef.”
“I want something thick and juicy, something I can bite into. Don't give me that fancy stuff give me meat.”
Off-site storage of materials is another option. It removes the materials from the physical space but still leaves them accessible.
Topic 2 – Impact of Research and how librarians affect it?
How do librarians impact on research, researchers?
There is a discrepancy between what can be measured and what is valuable. Numbers that can be measured give only certain bits of data. Gate counts, circulation of books, number of questions at the desk only show that the library and resources have been used but do not give a greater meaning to the impact of the library upon research. Obtaining that kind of information, of a meaning impact is very difficult or impossible to obtain.
Ideally we'd like to say that because the library was open X researcher looked up information on Y to make conclusion Z. Thus we can show an immediate impact on the research thus reaffirming in everyone's mind that the library has a needed and meaningful existence. How does one create such a situation in real life when research goes on for years, over the course of multiple institutions and perhaps thousands of information sources?
Numerics have an immediate application in circulation and can help determine what materials are used, not used, and are no longer needed. A question came up about keeping older texts which are obviously out of date but have historical value. The reason to keep them would be for the historical contrast and so that individuals have the ability to go back and say 'Oh, this what people thought about this subject back when dinosaurs roamed the Earth.' Removing the older texts frees up space but also limits the information that people can find, especially if it is the last copy of an out-of-print item. The Florida Academic Repository allows for digital copies of said items to be deposited there, but that is only a local chapter. If their hardware fails or the data is lost, poof. All gone. What is needed is a central warehouse of information whose job is collect and store for posterity a copy of every material ever printed. No editing of information, just storage and retrieval.
Topic 3 – Library verses Librarians
Then there was the question of the librarian. What value do they add? They are the subject expert and the person everyone goes to if there is an issue. People revere the library, it helps the schools, the community, allows for this and that and blah blah blah. Everyone likes to talk about how great and wonderful the library is but not willing to shell out money to support it even though they just exclaimed its virtues. One slight problem. A library itself does not do much. A library, books, databases are all tools and cannot assist a community by itself. The staff and librarians who run the library make those tools available and accessible.
Some folks even commented that the American Library Association should change its name to the American Librarian Association.
Topic 4 – Embedded Librarianship
How to get invited to staff meetings and show faculty you can help?
One way one individual got access to staff meetings was through a new dean at their school. It created the opportunity for new ideas to be exchanged. One idea was to ask to be invited to the monthly staff meetings. Issues are that one needs a new dean and typically one doesn't want to wait that long.
Another way was to assist one individual, help them and show them how beneficial the library and the library staff can be thus creating an advocate to help promote the promise of the library. This works so long as the individual is there and/or willing to think of the library as an asset. Once they go, well then you're back to square one.
Having office hours in the department has both pros and cons. The pros are that if one is located at a key point, aka in a high traffic area, then people start to recognize the staff there. People can identify you as 'hey, you’re the subject librarian!' which is all well and good but how does one rate relationships with faculty and students in library metrics? Is there any way to measure that and what does it mean? The librarians are also there, easily accessible to the faculty and students when they need them. The cons are that it really depends on where the individual from the library is located. If you're not in a high traffic area, just shoved into a corner someplace where nobody will see you, then it may not work out.
Topic 5 – Professional Development
What do people do to continue to gain skills and such?
The ALA immediately came up as well as local chapters. SLA, science boot camps, virtual conferences such as Library 2.014, MOOCs, and webinars.
Topic 6 – Data Management
How does one get faculty to use the library, or librarians, as a tool to help facilitate their research. After all, they are the experts on the subject.
Each person will need to adjust to their needs and circumstances accordingly, but in general the response went along this line. Ask the faculty about their research and get them to tell you all about it. Assuming they are interested they should be more than willing to discuss it with you. This will be the hard part, you'll need to listen to them. Listen and wait and be patient until you know enough about what they do to say 'okay, here's how I can help.' Find out what their needs are, as researchers what do they require because they can't be an expert in all subjects!