ALA Members

Dear Members,

The long awaited preliminary recommendations from the Steering Committee on Organizational Effectiveness (SCOE) are here for your analysis, comments, and input! These focus on building upon the strengths of ALA to embrace our mission and core values, to create alignment within our association, and to bring value to our members. Ultimately, we are looking towards our future as an association together, for the future of libraries and the future of information access. We hope these recommendations look at ways our association can cultivate and support member and staff leadership, engagement, and trust, as the SCOE considered options based on the urgency from member input, data trends and financial realities. This is truly a once-in-a-generation opportunity to create a more efficient organization for future members and to address issues that have been decades in the making. (For a history on the work of SCOE, please visit and join our ALA Connect community.)

The attached slide deck goes into the details of the preliminary recommendations and is what will be discussed at Annual in DC as well as virtually during our SCOE input webinar on July 8th at 11am.

Briefly, SCOE's preliminary recommendations include:

• Responding to the urgency of member input, data trends and financial realities for a thriving future.
• Redesigning the ALA Executive Board and Council for effective and efficient prioritization and broad member input.
• Modernizing ways that members engage in the work of the association and with each other in the library community.
• Channeling the function of Council through a new committee structure with less barriers where members will engage in the work of the Association through Committees, Task Forces and Advisory Communities that make direct recommendations to the Board and are accountable directly to the board.
• Members engaging with each other through Divisions, Roundtables and Interest Groups.

Per the timeline as outlined on slide 5, we will be taking input and feedback and integrating comments from members into the next phase of our recommendations, which we hope will be final recommendations, but may become a round two of recommendations depending on the feedback we receive over the next few months.

We invite you to our virtual and in person presentations and have multiple avenues for providing feedback:

• Virtually
• Input Webinar on July 8th at 1pm Central: Jim Meffert and SCOE Chair, Lessa Pelayo-Lozada will present on the preliminary recommendations and solicit feedback via the webinar chat box. Register here
• Reply to this thread in the SCOE ALA Connect community or the ALA Members community.
• Email lessalozada@gmail.com
• In Person at ALA Annual in Washington, D.C.
• All sessions will be held in Washington Convent Center, Room 103B

• Saturday, June 22, 12:00pm - 1:30pm
• Saturday, June 22, 2:30pm - 4:00pm
• Sunday, June 23, 12:00 pm - 1:30pm
• Sunday, June 23, 2:30pm - 4:00pm
• Monday, June 24, 12:00pm - 1:30pm

Our committee has tried its best to integrate as much of the feedback as we could in to these preliminary recommendations thoughtfully and intentionally. We look forward to hearing your input over the next few months.

Sincerely,

Lessa Kanani'opua Pelayo-Lozada

SCOE Chair

Clearly there has been lot of thought and effort put into these recommendations - Thank you and kudos to the entire group for developing and organizing the recommendations. I agree with many of the suggestions and have questions (because I almost always have questions :)

Again, I like many of the ideas. However, my perspective on governance structures is guided by my enjoyment of board games. When one is playing a board game, whether collaborative or competitive, there are always players who attempt to maximise their individual power or directly influence situations to their benefit in the course of a game. In my opinion, the goal of ALA governance structure and rules should be to minimize opportunities for power consolidation and maximise representation of a wide variety of perspectives and priorities.

1. I am interested by the Executive Board design, is it normal (i.e. is it a best practice) for appointed members to be voting members? 
2. I see a good amount of streamlining, but I am concerned by the removal of a large body of elected representatives that would be tasked with discussion and recommendations for (and oversight of) association policy. 
3. I was surprised to see this quotation in the Leadership Assemblies (slide 16) description of current practice -- "This structure will reduce the current barriers for communication to the Executive Board where members must communicate first through council who then may communicate to the Executive Board"
   
   • This is not my impression of how things actually work. Exec Board liaises directly with many constituent groups (committees, divisions, roundtables) 
   • There was formerly a Division Leadership assembly session at Midwinter (iirc) until 3-5 years ago at which time that session stopped happening (or maybe division councilors stopped getting invited? or maybe I missed the invitations in the email deluge) 
4. My first-glance impresion is that the structure for the various assemblies feels more hierarchical than the current model
5. Streamlining divisions should be a Division-driven effort & process - not a top-down directive. ALCTS, LITA, & LLAMA are well along in their process, for example
6.  My last general impression is that there seems to be no officially constituted body that brings together a wide range of interests for formal discussion and consideration of interests, concerns, information sharing, policy making/setting/changing, and in-general discussion of association governance
   • I find this problematic because the current body constituted for these purposes, ALA Council, has been an effective place for moving ALA forward (perhaps not fast enough for some) while also strategically assessing and guiding the use of ALA political capital in DC and nationally

Clearly there has been lot of thought and effort put into these recommendations - Thank you and kudos to the entire group for developing and organizing the recommendations. I agree with many of the suggestions and have questions (because I almost always have questions :)

Again, I like many of the ideas. However, my perspective on governance structures is guided by my enjoyment of board games. When one is playing a board game, whether collaborative or competitive, there are always players who attempt to maximise their individual power or directly influence situations to their benefit in the course of a game. In my opinion, the goal of ALA governance structure and rules should be to minimize opportunities for power consolidation and maximise representation of a wide variety of perspectives and priorities.

1. I am interested by the Executive Board design, is it normal (i.e. is it a best practice) for appointed members to be voting members? 
2. I see a good amount of streamlining, but I am concerned by the removal of a large body of elected representatives that would be tasked with discussion and recommendations for (and oversight of) association policy. 
3. I was surprised to see this quotation in the Leadership Assemblies (slide 16) description of current practice -- "This structure will reduce the current barriers for communication to the Executive Board where members must communicate first through council who then may communicate to the Executive Board"
   
   • This is not my impression of how things actually work. Exec Board liaises directly with many constituent groups (committees, divisions, roundtables) 
   • There was formerly a Division Leadership assembly session at Midwinter (iirc) until 3-5 years ago at which time that session stopped happening (or maybe division councilors stopped getting invited? or maybe I missed the invitations in the email deluge) 
4. My first-glance impresion is that the structure for the various assemblies feels more hierarchical than the current model
5. Streamlining divisions should be a Division-driven effort & process - not a top-down directive. ALCTS, LITA, & LLAMA are well along in their process, for example
6.  My last general impression is that there seems to be no officially constituted body that brings together a wide range of interests for formal discussion and consideration of interests, concerns, information sharing, policy making/setting/changing, and in-general discussion of association governance
   • I find this problematic because the current body constituted for these purposes, ALA Council, has been an effective place for moving ALA forward (perhaps not fast enough for some) while also strategically assessing and guiding the use of ALA political capital in DC and nationally

Clearly there has been lot of thought and effort put into these recommendations - Thank you and kudos to the entire group for developing and organizing the recommendations. I agree with many of the suggestions and have questions (because I almost always have questions :)

Again, I like many of the ideas. However, my perspective on governance structures is guided by my enjoyment of board games. When one is playing a board game, whether collaborative or competitive, there are always players who attempt to maximise their individual power or directly influence situations to their benefit in the course of a game. In my opinion, the goal of ALA governance structure and rules should be to minimize opportunities for power consolidation and maximise representation of a wide variety of perspectives and priorities.

1. I am interested by the Executive Board design, is it normal (i.e. is it a best practice) for appointed members to be voting members? 
2. I see a good amount of streamlining, but I am concerned by the removal of a large body of elected representatives that would be tasked with discussion and recommendations for (and oversight of) association policy. 
3. I was surprised to see this quotation in the Leadership Assemblies (slide 16) description of current practice -- "This structure will reduce the current barriers for communication to the Executive Board where members must communicate first through council who then may communicate to the Executive Board"
   
   • This is not my impression of how things actually work. Exec Board liaises directly with many constituent groups (committees, divisions, roundtables) 
   • There was formerly a Division Leadership assembly session at Midwinter (iirc) until 3-5 years ago at which time that session stopped happening (or maybe division councilors stopped getting invited? or maybe I missed the invitations in the email deluge) 
4. My first-glance impresion is that the structure for the various assemblies feels more hierarchical than the current model
5. Streamlining divisions should be a Division-driven effort & process - not a top-down directive. ALCTS, LITA, & LLAMA are well along in their process, for example
6.  My last general impression is that there seems to be no officially constituted body that brings together a wide range of interests for formal discussion and consideration of interests, concerns, information sharing, policy making/setting/changing, and in-general discussion of association governance
   • I find this problematic because the current body constituted for these purposes, ALA Council, has been an effective place for moving ALA forward (perhaps not fast enough for some) while also strategically assessing and guiding the use of ALA political capital in DC and nationally

Clearly there has been lot of thought and effort put into these recommendations - Thank you and kudos to the entire group for developing and organizing the recommendations. I agree with many of the suggestions and have questions (because I almost always have questions :)

Again, I like many of the ideas. However, my perspective on governance structures is guided by my enjoyment of board games. When one is playing a board game, whether collaborative or competitive, there are always players who attempt to maximise their individual power or directly influence situations to their benefit in the course of a game. In my opinion, the goal of ALA governance structure and rules should be to minimize opportunities for power consolidation and maximise representation of a wide variety of perspectives and priorities.

1. I am interested by the Executive Board design, is it normal (i.e. is it a best practice) for appointed members to be voting members? 
2. I see a good amount of streamlining, but I am concerned by the removal of a large body of elected representatives that would be tasked with discussion and recommendations for (and oversight of) association policy. 
3. I was surprised to see this quotation in the Leadership Assemblies (slide 16) description of current practice -- "This structure will reduce the current barriers for communication to the Executive Board where members must communicate first through council who then may communicate to the Executive Board"
   
   • This is not my impression of how things actually work. Exec Board liaises directly with many constituent groups (committees, divisions, roundtables) 
   • There was formerly a Division Leadership assembly session at Midwinter (iirc) until 3-5 years ago at which time that session stopped happening (or maybe division councilors stopped getting invited? or maybe I missed the invitations in the email deluge) 
4. My first-glance impresion is that the structure for the various assemblies feels more hierarchical than the current model
5. Streamlining divisions should be a Division-driven effort & process - not a top-down directive. ALCTS, LITA, & LLAMA are well along in their process, for example
6.  My last general impression is that there seems to be no officially constituted body that brings together a wide range of interests for formal discussion and consideration of interests, concerns, information sharing, policy making/setting/changing, and in-general discussion of association governance
   • I find this problematic because the current body constituted for these purposes, ALA Council, has been an effective place for moving ALA forward (perhaps not fast enough for some) while also strategically assessing and guiding the use of ALA political capital in DC and nationally

Clearly there has been lot of thought and effort put into these recommendations - Thank you and kudos to the entire group for developing and organizing the recommendations. I agree with many of the suggestions and have questions (because I almost always have questions :)

Again, I like many of the ideas. However, my perspective on governance structures is guided by my enjoyment of board games. When one is playing a board game, whether collaborative or competitive, there are always players who attempt to maximise their individual power or directly influence situations to their benefit in the course of a game. In my opinion, the goal of ALA governance structure and rules should be to minimize opportunities for power consolidation and maximise representation of a wide variety of perspectives and priorities.

1. I am interested by the Executive Board design, is it normal (i.e. is it a best practice) for appointed members to be voting members? 
2. I see a good amount of streamlining, but I am concerned by the removal of a large body of elected representatives that would be tasked with discussion and recommendations for (and oversight of) association policy. 
3. I was surprised to see this quotation in the Leadership Assemblies (slide 16) description of current practice -- "This structure will reduce the current barriers for communication to the Executive Board where members must communicate first through council who then may communicate to the Executive Board"
   
   • This is not my impression of how things actually work. Exec Board liaises directly with many constituent groups (committees, divisions, roundtables) 
   • There was formerly a Division Leadership assembly session at Midwinter (iirc) until 3-5 years ago at which time that session stopped happening (or maybe division councilors stopped getting invited? or maybe I missed the invitations in the email deluge) 
4. My first-glance impresion is that the structure for the various assemblies feels more hierarchical than the current model
5. Streamlining divisions should be a Division-driven effort & process - not a top-down directive. ALCTS, LITA, & LLAMA are well along in their process, for example
6.  My last general impression is that there seems to be no officially constituted body that brings together a wide range of interests for formal discussion and consideration of interests, concerns, information sharing, policy making/setting/changing, and in-general discussion of association governance
   • I find this problematic because the current body constituted for these purposes, ALA Council, has been an effective place for moving ALA forward (perhaps not fast enough for some) while also strategically assessing and guiding the use of ALA political capital in DC and nationally

Dear Members,

The long awaited preliminary recommendations from the Steering Committee on Organizational Effectiveness (SCOE) are here for your analysis, comments, and input! These focus on building upon the strengths of ALA to embrace our mission and core values, to create alignment within our association, and to bring value to our members. Ultimately, we are looking towards our future as an association together, for the future of libraries and the future of information access. We hope these recommendations look at ways our association can cultivate and support member and staff leadership, engagement, and trust, as the SCOE considered options based on the urgency from member input, data trends and financial realities. This is truly a once-in-a-generation opportunity to create a more efficient organization for future members and to address issues that have been decades in the making. (For a history on the work of SCOE, please visit and join our ALA Connect community.)

The attached slide deck goes into the details of the preliminary recommendations and is what will be discussed at Annual in DC as well as virtually during our SCOE input webinar on July 8th at 11am.

Briefly, SCOE's preliminary recommendations include:

• Responding to the urgency of member input, data trends and financial realities for a thriving future.
• Redesigning the ALA Executive Board and Council for effective and efficient prioritization and broad member input.
• Modernizing ways that members engage in the work of the association and with each other in the library community.
• Channeling the function of Council through a new committee structure with less barriers where members will engage in the work of the Association through Committees, Task Forces and Advisory Communities that make direct recommendations to the Board and are accountable directly to the board.
• Members engaging with each other through Divisions, Roundtables and Interest Groups.

Per the timeline as outlined on slide 5, we will be taking input and feedback and integrating comments from members into the next phase of our recommendations, which we hope will be final recommendations, but may become a round two of recommendations depending on the feedback we receive over the next few months.

We invite you to our virtual and in person presentations and have multiple avenues for providing feedback:

• Virtually
• Input Webinar on July 8th at 1pm Central: Jim Meffert and SCOE Chair, Lessa Pelayo-Lozada will present on the preliminary recommendations and solicit feedback via the webinar chat box. Register here
• Reply to this thread in the SCOE ALA Connect community or the ALA Members community.
• Email lessalozada@gmail.com
• In Person at ALA Annual in Washington, D.C.
• All sessions will be held in Washington Convent Center, Room 103B

• Saturday, June 22, 12:00pm - 1:30pm
• Saturday, June 22, 2:30pm - 4:00pm
• Sunday, June 23, 12:00 pm - 1:30pm
• Sunday, June 23, 2:30pm - 4:00pm
• Monday, June 24, 12:00pm - 1:30pm

Our committee has tried its best to integrate as much of the feedback as we could in to these preliminary recommendations thoughtfully and intentionally. We look forward to hearing your input over the next few months.

Sincerely,

Lessa Kanani'opua Pelayo-Lozada

SCOE Chair

Dear Members,

The long awaited preliminary recommendations from the Steering Committee on Organizational Effectiveness (SCOE) are here for your analysis, comments, and input! These focus on building upon the strengths of ALA to embrace our mission and core values, to create alignment within our association, and to bring value to our members. Ultimately, we are looking towards our future as an association together, for the future of libraries and the future of information access. We hope these recommendations look at ways our association can cultivate and support member and staff leadership, engagement, and trust, as the SCOE considered options based on the urgency from member input, data trends and financial realities. This is truly a once-in-a-generation opportunity to create a more efficient organization for future members and to address issues that have been decades in the making. (For a history on the work of SCOE, please visit and join our ALA Connect community.)

The attached slide deck goes into the details of the preliminary recommendations and is what will be discussed at Annual in DC as well as virtually during our SCOE input webinar on July 8th at 11am.

Briefly, SCOE's preliminary recommendations include:

• Responding to the urgency of member input, data trends and financial realities for a thriving future.
• Redesigning the ALA Executive Board and Council for effective and efficient prioritization and broad member input.
• Modernizing ways that members engage in the work of the association and with each other in the library community.
• Channeling the function of Council through a new committee structure with less barriers where members will engage in the work of the Association through Committees, Task Forces and Advisory Communities that make direct recommendations to the Board and are accountable directly to the board.
• Members engaging with each other through Divisions, Roundtables and Interest Groups.

Per the timeline as outlined on slide 5, we will be taking input and feedback and integrating comments from members into the next phase of our recommendations, which we hope will be final recommendations, but may become a round two of recommendations depending on the feedback we receive over the next few months.

We invite you to our virtual and in person presentations and have multiple avenues for providing feedback:

• Virtually
• Input Webinar on July 8th at 1pm Central: Jim Meffert and SCOE Chair, Lessa Pelayo-Lozada will present on the preliminary recommendations and solicit feedback via the webinar chat box. Register here
• Reply to this thread in the SCOE ALA Connect community or the ALA Members community.
• Email lessalozada@gmail.com
• In Person at ALA Annual in Washington, D.C.
• All sessions will be held in Washington Convent Center, Room 103B

• Saturday, June 22, 12:00pm - 1:30pm
• Saturday, June 22, 2:30pm - 4:00pm
• Sunday, June 23, 12:00 pm - 1:30pm
• Sunday, June 23, 2:30pm - 4:00pm
• Monday, June 24, 12:00pm - 1:30pm

Our committee has tried its best to integrate as much of the feedback as we could in to these preliminary recommendations thoughtfully and intentionally. We look forward to hearing your input over the next few months.

Sincerely,

Lessa Kanani'opua Pelayo-Lozada

SCOE Chair

Dear Members,

The long awaited preliminary recommendations from the Steering Committee on Organizational Effectiveness (SCOE) are here for your analysis, comments, and input! These focus on building upon the strengths of ALA to embrace our mission and core values, to create alignment within our association, and to bring value to our members. Ultimately, we are looking towards our future as an association together, for the future of libraries and the future of information access. We hope these recommendations look at ways our association can cultivate and support member and staff leadership, engagement, and trust, as the SCOE considered options based on the urgency from member input, data trends and financial realities. This is truly a once-in-a-generation opportunity to create a more efficient organization for future members and to address issues that have been decades in the making. (For a history on the work of SCOE, please visit and join our ALA Connect community.)

The attached slide deck goes into the details of the preliminary recommendations and is what will be discussed at Annual in DC as well as virtually during our SCOE input webinar on July 8th at 11am.

Briefly, SCOE's preliminary recommendations include:

• Responding to the urgency of member input, data trends and financial realities for a thriving future.
• Redesigning the ALA Executive Board and Council for effective and efficient prioritization and broad member input.
• Modernizing ways that members engage in the work of the association and with each other in the library community.
• Channeling the function of Council through a new committee structure with less barriers where members will engage in the work of the Association through Committees, Task Forces and Advisory Communities that make direct recommendations to the Board and are accountable directly to the board.
• Members engaging with each other through Divisions, Roundtables and Interest Groups.

Per the timeline as outlined on slide 5, we will be taking input and feedback and integrating comments from members into the next phase of our recommendations, which we hope will be final recommendations, but may become a round two of recommendations depending on the feedback we receive over the next few months.

We invite you to our virtual and in person presentations and have multiple avenues for providing feedback:

• Virtually
• Input Webinar on July 8th at 1pm Central: Jim Meffert and SCOE Chair, Lessa Pelayo-Lozada will present on the preliminary recommendations and solicit feedback via the webinar chat box. Register here
• Reply to this thread in the SCOE ALA Connect community or the ALA Members community.
• Email lessalozada@gmail.com
• In Person at ALA Annual in Washington, D.C.
• All sessions will be held in Washington Convent Center, Room 103B

• Saturday, June 22, 12:00pm - 1:30pm
• Saturday, June 22, 2:30pm - 4:00pm
• Sunday, June 23, 12:00 pm - 1:30pm
• Sunday, June 23, 2:30pm - 4:00pm
• Monday, June 24, 12:00pm - 1:30pm

Our committee has tried its best to integrate as much of the feedback as we could in to these preliminary recommendations thoughtfully and intentionally. We look forward to hearing your input over the next few months.

Sincerely,

Lessa Kanani'opua Pelayo-Lozada

SCOE Chair

Dear Members,

The long awaited preliminary recommendations from the Steering Committee on Organizational Effectiveness (SCOE) are here for your analysis, comments, and input! These focus on building upon the strengths of ALA to embrace our mission and core values, to create alignment within our association, and to bring value to our members. Ultimately, we are looking towards our future as an association together, for the future of libraries and the future of information access. We hope these recommendations look at ways our association can cultivate and support member and staff leadership, engagement, and trust, as the SCOE considered options based on the urgency from member input, data trends and financial realities. This is truly a once-in-a-generation opportunity to create a more efficient organization for future members and to address issues that have been decades in the making. (For a history on the work of SCOE, please visit and join our ALA Connect community.)

The attached slide deck goes into the details of the preliminary recommendations and is what will be discussed at Annual in DC as well as virtually during our SCOE input webinar on July 8th at 11am.

Briefly, SCOE's preliminary recommendations include:

• Responding to the urgency of member input, data trends and financial realities for a thriving future.
• Redesigning the ALA Executive Board and Council for effective and efficient prioritization and broad member input.
• Modernizing ways that members engage in the work of the association and with each other in the library community.
• Channeling the function of Council through a new committee structure with less barriers where members will engage in the work of the Association through Committees, Task Forces and Advisory Communities that make direct recommendations to the Board and are accountable directly to the board.
• Members engaging with each other through Divisions, Roundtables and Interest Groups.

Per the timeline as outlined on slide 5, we will be taking input and feedback and integrating comments from members into the next phase of our recommendations, which we hope will be final recommendations, but may become a round two of recommendations depending on the feedback we receive over the next few months.

We invite you to our virtual and in person presentations and have multiple avenues for providing feedback:

• Virtually
• Input Webinar on July 8th at 1pm Central: Jim Meffert and SCOE Chair, Lessa Pelayo-Lozada will present on the preliminary recommendations and solicit feedback via the webinar chat box. Register here
• Reply to this thread in the SCOE ALA Connect community or the ALA Members community.
• Email lessalozada@gmail.com
• In Person at ALA Annual in Washington, D.C.
• All sessions will be held in Washington Convent Center, Room 103B

• Saturday, June 22, 12:00pm - 1:30pm
• Saturday, June 22, 2:30pm - 4:00pm
• Sunday, June 23, 12:00 pm - 1:30pm
• Sunday, June 23, 2:30pm - 4:00pm
• Monday, June 24, 12:00pm - 1:30pm

Our committee has tried its best to integrate as much of the feedback as we could in to these preliminary recommendations thoughtfully and intentionally. We look forward to hearing your input over the next few months.

Sincerely,

Lessa Kanani'opua Pelayo-Lozada

SCOE Chair

Dear Members,

The long awaited preliminary recommendations from the Steering Committee on Organizational Effectiveness (SCOE) are here for your analysis, comments, and input! These focus on building upon the strengths of ALA to embrace our mission and core values, to create alignment within our association, and to bring value to our members. Ultimately, we are looking towards our future as an association together, for the future of libraries and the future of information access. We hope these recommendations look at ways our association can cultivate and support member and staff leadership, engagement, and trust, as the SCOE considered options based on the urgency from member input, data trends and financial realities. This is truly a once-in-a-generation opportunity to create a more efficient organization for future members and to address issues that have been decades in the making. (For a history on the work of SCOE, please visit and join our ALA Connect community.)

The attached slide deck goes into the details of the preliminary recommendations and is what will be discussed at Annual in DC as well as virtually during our SCOE input webinar on July 8th at 11am.

Briefly, SCOE's preliminary recommendations include:

• Responding to the urgency of member input, data trends and financial realities for a thriving future.
• Redesigning the ALA Executive Board and Council for effective and efficient prioritization and broad member input.
• Modernizing ways that members engage in the work of the association and with each other in the library community.
• Channeling the function of Council through a new committee structure with less barriers where members will engage in the work of the Association through Committees, Task Forces and Advisory Communities that make direct recommendations to the Board and are accountable directly to the board.
• Members engaging with each other through Divisions, Roundtables and Interest Groups.

Per the timeline as outlined on slide 5, we will be taking input and feedback and integrating comments from members into the next phase of our recommendations, which we hope will be final recommendations, but may become a round two of recommendations depending on the feedback we receive over the next few months.

We invite you to our virtual and in person presentations and have multiple avenues for providing feedback:

• Virtually
• Input Webinar on July 8th at 1pm Central: Jim Meffert and SCOE Chair, Lessa Pelayo-Lozada will present on the preliminary recommendations and solicit feedback via the webinar chat box. Register here
• Reply to this thread in the SCOE ALA Connect community or the ALA Members community.
• Email lessalozada@gmail.com
• In Person at ALA Annual in Washington, D.C.
• All sessions will be held in Washington Convent Center, Room 103B

• Saturday, June 22, 12:00pm - 1:30pm
• Saturday, June 22, 2:30pm - 4:00pm
• Sunday, June 23, 12:00 pm - 1:30pm
• Sunday, June 23, 2:30pm - 4:00pm
• Monday, June 24, 12:00pm - 1:30pm

Our committee has tried its best to integrate as much of the feedback as we could in to these preliminary recommendations thoughtfully and intentionally. We look forward to hearing your input over the next few months.

Sincerely,

Lessa Kanani'opua Pelayo-Lozada

SCOE Chair