ACRL IS Teaching Methods Committee Instruction Section

Review completed annotations

  • 1.  Review completed annotations

    Posted May 16, 2016 07:48 AM

    Good Morning,


    Thank you everyone for completing your annotations for the selected resources! 


    The next step is for everyone to take a look at all of the annotations and get committee approval before they go to the IS Publication Editor and the Executive Committee.  The annotations can be reviewed in our Google Doc at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QNNVuiG48Zwh0c8-sPkZnoIGU9k1Mb6FJeYY6EA4Yks/edit?usp=sharing


    If we can get committee approval in the next couple of days, this will keep us on track with our timeline.  We can talk more about this at the meeting today.


    Thanks again!


    Carrie, Karen, and Christine



  • 2.  RE: Review completed annotations

    Posted May 16, 2016 12:10 PM

    They look good to me!  The only thing I noticed was already captured by Sara (see comments posted in Google doc).  

    Thanks to everyone for drafting the annotations and thanks to Carrie, Karen, and Christine for their work coordinating this project!



  • 3.  RE: Review completed annotations

    Posted May 16, 2016 01:11 PM

    It looks good to me!



  • 4.  RE: Review completed annotations

    Posted May 16, 2016 01:22 PM

    These all look great.  Thanks!



  • 5.  RE: Review completed annotations

    Posted May 16, 2016 01:48 PM

    I added a couple comments in the document itself. Other than that, this looks great to me!



  • 6.  RE: Review completed annotations

    Posted May 16, 2016 02:49 PM

    The issues Sara pointed out have been addressed, so those comments were marked as resolved. These annotations look great!



  • 7.  RE: Review completed annotations

    Posted May 16, 2016 03:36 PM

    Looks good to me as well. 



  • 8.  RE: Review completed annotations

    Posted May 17, 2016 07:51 AM

    Thanks to everyone who has looked at the annotations!  Thank you Sara for your comments and thanks Christine for making the changes.  Any additional comments are due Friday, May 20.



  • 9.  RE: Review completed annotations

    Posted May 19, 2016 01:47 PM

    Hi everyone!

    These look great! I did one nitpicky thing without asking, which is adding periods to the annotation authorship statements that were missing them. Also, we have a real mishmash of citation formats. We determined that format doesn't really matter since the selections are going into Zotero and Mendeley, but Lori might need to know that. We can generate a proper Chicago Author-Date list for archiving when we have everything entered there.

    Thank you all for your great work on these!