Print Message

   RE: PsycINFO - preference for platform?
 From: Jocelyn Boice
 To: Evidence Synthesis Methods Interest Group
 Posted: Feb 06, 2023 05:26 PM
 Message:

Hi Anita,

 

Just a heads-up that the EBSCO interface feature for exporting citations for an entire results list has to be turned on in the admin portal, otherwise the only option is to add results to a folder in small batches (I think 50 at a time might be the limit?) and then export from the folder.  At least that was the case a few years ago when CSU discovered and turned on the feature, which was a life-changer for those doing evidence synthesis work!

 

Sharing in case it is helpful for others.

 

Best wishes,

 

Jocelyn

 

 

---

Jocelyn Boice

Associate Professor / Collection and Data Analysis Librarian

Collection Strategies Unit

Colorado State University Libraries

1019 Campus Delivery

Fort Collins, CO 80523-1019

970-491-3882 | jocelyn.boice@colostate.edu



-------------------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 2/3/2023 2:51:00 AM
From: Zahra Premji
Subject: RE: PsycINFO - preference for platform?

I agree with the other responses. Overall, both EBSCO and OVID are easy to use and have reasonable exporting options. EBSCO actually has the largest export limit and I haven't had any issues with exporting from it recently.
  • Personally, I find the OVID interface the best to use and the most flexible in terms of functions and operators (frequency and limited truncation operators, not requiring quotation marks to prevent auto-lemmatization, etc.) and is the interface I learned search on and am most familiar with as well.
  • The EBSCO interface has its advantages (larger export limit, ability to search multiple databases and access multiple thesauri when doing so) and most of us use the EBSCO platform for other databases so there is familiarity there too.
  • The ProQuest interface seems to be the most finicky. I haven't used PsycInfo on ProQuest but I do search other databases on it, so I assume it isn't any different. The new bulk export feature from the My research page (which is only available for some databases on PQ) is better than the previous options, but there are other issues (length searches time out - or they used to, etc.).
I wouldn't switch from EBSCO to Proquest anytime soon.

------------------------------
Zahra Premji
Health Research Librarian
University of Victoria Libraries
She/Her/Hers
------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: Jan 30, 2023 09:39 PM
From: Anita Kuiken
Subject: PsycINFO - preference for platform?

Hi, folks.

We currently have PsycINFO on the EBSCO platform. When conducting Evidence Synthesis-related research projects, we had heard that it was easier to download results on the Proquest platform. When it comes to Ev Synth work, do you all have a platform preference? If so, why do you like one over the other?

 

Best,

Anita

 

Anita Kuiken, MSLIS, AHIP (queue-ken)
(Pronouns: she/her/hers)
Librarian for Falk College of Sport & Human Dynamics
Research Impact Team
Syracuse University Libraries

O 315-443-9766
akuiken@syr.edu
LinkedIn

Need help with research? Find library content from these research guides in the areas I support: Exercise Science | Food Studies | Human Development & Family Science | Marriage & Family Therapy | Nutrition Science & Dietetics | Public Health | Social Work | Sport Management | Aging Studies l Stabler Running Collection

130 Sims Dr., Syracuse, NY 13244
library.syr.edu

Syracuse University