Print Message

   RE: Guidelines for Traditional Lit Reviews
 From: Tenley Sablatzky
 To: Evidence Synthesis Methods Interest Group
 Posted: Jun 02, 2021 10:48 PM
 Message:
I use the following articles to explain literature reviews to my students. I teach pre-med undergrads so they may be slightly below the level you're looking for... but they both provide a good overview of what a lit review is and how to do one. 

Leite, Debora F.B., Maria Auxiliadora Soares Padilha, and Jose G. Cecatti. "Approaching Literature Review for Academic Purposes: The Literature Review Checklist." Clinics 74 (2019). https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2019/e1403.
Wee, Bert Van, and David Banister. "How to Write a Literature Review Paper?" Transport Reviews 36, no. 2 (March 3, 2016): 278–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1065456.


------------------------------
Tenley Sablatzky
Medical Librarian
Prairie View A & M University
She/Her/Hers
------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: Jun 02, 2021 12:19 PM
From: Angie Gerrard
Subject: Guidelines for Traditional Lit Reviews

Good morning,

 

I recognize the focus of this interest group is on evidence / synthesis reviews (SRs) but I am looking for recommendations on useful articles or book chapters that discuss guidelines on conducting rigorous traditional literature reviews.  While working with grad students who are starting their lit reviews as part of their dissertation or thesis, I have found many of them crave the kind of direction or structure (i.e. guidelines or methods) afforded by SRs (but they themselves are not in a position to undertake a formal SRs as part of their studies).  While I use the term "traditional" lit reviews, it would be helpful to have a more fulsome break-down of the different kinds of reviews considered under this concept and the guidelines or methods underpinning each. I was thinking of Sutton, A., Clowes, M., Preston, L., & Booth, A. (2019), but while this article outlines the continuum of review types, it doesn't shed much light on the methodology underpinning these more traditional lit reviews.

 

To be honest, I'm not 100% certain on what I am looking for but I think I will know it when I see it ��

 

Thank-you for any direction or recommendations you can provide.

 

Cheers,

Angie Gerrard

 

 

 

 

Angie Gerrard, BA, MLIS
Pronouns: she/her/hers

Learning Support Librarian & Liaison to Psychology & Political Studies
Student Learning Services, University Library
University of Saskatchewan
Room 122.6, Murray Building, 3 Campus Dr
Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A4
306.966.6004