Syndicate content

RUSA RSS Discovery Services Committee (Reference Services Section) Committee

In: RUSA RSS (Reference Services Section), Reference Services, Technology

Bibliography

Articles:

Asher, A., Duke, L., & Wilson, S. (2013). Paths of Discovery: Comparing the Search Effectiveness of EBSCO Discovery Service, Summon, Google Scholar, and Conventional Library Resources. College & Research Libraries, 74(5), 464-488.

1
View:   Faces | List
DiscussionsDiscussions
Discussions

Online Doc Catalog Use Bibliography

by Tiffany Hebb on Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 09:57 am

Bibliography

Articles:

Asher, A., Duke, L., & Wilson, S. (2013). Paths of Discovery: Comparing the Search Effectiveness of EBSCO Discovery Service, Summon, Google Scholar, and Conventional Library Resources. College & Research Libraries, 74(5), 464-488.

Bibliography

Articles:

Asher, A., Duke, L., & Wilson, S. (2013). Paths of Discovery: Comparing the Search Effectiveness of EBSCO Discovery Service, Summon, Google Scholar, and Conventional Library Resources. College & Research Libraries, 74(5), 464-488.

Bauer, K., Friscia, M., & Matheson, S. (2012). From the Catalog to the Book on the Shelf: Building a Mapping Application for Vufind. Code4lib Journal, (17), 1-8. - See more at: http://connect.ala.org/node/202483#sthash.Oazao61t.dpuf

Belford, R. (2014). Evaluating Library Discovery Tools through a Music Lens. Library Resources & Technical Services, 58(1), 49-72. 

Boyer, G., Bacon, V. & Hill, K. (2014). Creating a Cohesive Discovery Service. Serials Review, 40(3), 200-202. 

Bull, S., Craft, E. & Dodds, A. (2014). Evaluation of a Resource Discovery Service: FindIt@BhamNew Review of Academic Librarianship, 20(2), 137-166. 

Calvert, K. (2015). Maximizing Academic Library Collections: Measuring Changes in Use Patterns Owing to EBSCO Discovery Service. College & Research Libraries, 76(1), 81-99.

Chang, H. & Iyer, H. (2012). Trends in Twitter Hashtag Applications: Design Features for Value-Added Dimensions to Future Library Catalogues. Library Trends 61(1), 248-258.
Chickering, F. W. & Yang, S. K. (2014). Evaluation and Comparison of Discovery Tools: an Update. Information Technology & Libraries 23(2), 5-30.

Cmor, D. & Litwin, R. (2014). Should We Retire the Catalog? Reference & User Services Quarterly, 53(3), 213-216.

Cmor, D. & Li, X. (2012). Beyond Boolean, Towards Thinking: Discovery Systems and Information Literacy. Library Management, 33(8/9), 450-457.

Coyle, K. (2010). Cataloging Horizons. American Libraries, 41(3), 26.

Dalton, M. (2014). The Form of Search Tool Chosen by Undergraduate Students Influences Research Practices and the Type and Quality of Information Selected. Evidence Based Library & Information Practice, 9(2), 19-21. 

DeZelar-Tiedman, C. (2011). Exploring User-Contributed Metadata's Potential to Enhance Access to Literary Works. Library Resources & Technical Services, 55(4), 221-233.

Djenno, M., Insua, G., Gregory, G. & Brantley, J. (2014). Discovering Usability: Comparing Two Discovery Systems at One Academic Library. Journal of Web Librarianship, 8(3), 263-285.

Ellero, N. (2013). Integration or Disintegration: Where is Discovery Headed? Journal of Library Metadata, 13(4), 311-329.

Ellero, N. (2013). An Unexpected Discovery: One Library's Experience With Web-Scale Discovery Service (WSDS) Evaluation and Assessment. Journal of Library Administration, 53(5-6), 323-343.

Fawley, N. & Krysak, N. (2014). Learning to Love Your Discovery Tool: Strategies for Integrating a Discovery Tool in Face-To-Face, Synchronous, and Asynchronous Instruction. Public Services Quarterly, 10(4), 283-301.

Fu, L., & Thomes, C. (2014). Implementing Discipline-specific Searches in EBSCO Discovery Service. New Library World, 115(3/4), 4-4.

Fyn, A. & LuxRobert, J. (2013). Reflections on Teaching and Tweaking a Discovery Layer. Reference Services Review, 41(1), 113-124.

Harpel-Burke, P. (2012). Catalog Maintenance in the Discovery System: Opinions of Early Adopters. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(2-4), 246-263.

Hofmann, M. A., & Yang, S. Q. (2012). “Discovering” What's Changed: a Revisit of the OPACs of 260 Academic Libraries. Library Hi Tech, 30(2), 253-274.

Hoy, M. B. (2012). An Introduction to Web Scale Discovery Systems. Medical Reference Services Quarterly31(3), 323-329. doi:10.1080/02763869.2012.698186 - See more at: http://connect.ala.org/node/202483#sthash.mdnmYJk6.dpuf

Janyk, R. (2014). Augmenting Discovery Data and Analytics to Enhance Library Services. Insights: the UKSG journal, 27(3), 262-268.

Julien, C. & Guastavino, C. & Bouthillier, F. (2012). Capitalizing on Information Organization and Information Visualization for a New-Generation Catalogue. Library Trends 61(1), 149-161.

Kennedy, S. (2014). Uncovering Discovery Layer Services. Public Services Quarterly, 10(1), 54-61.

Leebaw, D., Conlan, B., Gonnerman, K., Johnston, S., & Sinkler-Miller, C. (2013). Improving Library Resource Discovery: Exploring the Possibilities of VuFind and Web-scale Discovery. Journal of Web Librarianship, 7(2), 154-189.

Lown, C. & Sierra, T. & Boyer, T. (2013). How Users Search the Library from a Single Search Box. College & Research Libraries, 74(3), 227-241.

Lundrigan, C., Manuel, K. & Yan, M. (2015). "Pretty Rad": Explorations in User Satisfaction with a Discovery Layer at Ryerson University. College & Research Libraries, 76(1), 43-62.

Lynema, E. & Lown, C. & Woodbury, D. (2012). Virtual Browse: Designing User-Oriented Services for Discovery of Related Resources. Library Trends 61(1), 218-233.

Meredith, W. (2013). Web-Scale Search and Virtual Reference Service: How Summon is Impacting Reference Question Complexity and Reference Service Delivery. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 18 (1), 1-13.

Miksa, F. (2012). The Legacy of the Library Catalogue for the Present. Library Trends 61(1), 7-34.

Morgan, E. L. (2012). Use and Understand: the Inclusion of Services Against Texts in Library Catalogs and “Discovery Systems”. Library Hi Tech, 30(1), 35-59.

Nichols, A., Billey, A., Spitzform, P., Stokes, A., & Tran, C. (2014). Kicking the Tires: a Usability Study of the Primo Discovery Tool. Journal of Web Librarianship, 8(2), 172-195.

Niu, X., Zhang, T., & Chen, H. (2014). Study of User Search Activities with Two Discovery Tools at an Academic Library. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(5), 422-433.

Phetteplace, E. & Darrington, J. (2014). A Hybrid Approach to Discovery Services. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 53(4), 291-295. 

Pinkas, M., Baglivo, M., Klein, I., Brown, E., Harris, R., & Gerhart, B. (2014). Selecting and Implementing a Discovery Tool: The University of Maryland Health Sciences and Human Services Library Experience. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 11(1), 1-12.

Pirmann, C. (2012). Tags in the Catalogue: Insights From a Usability Study of LibraryThing for Libraries. Library Trends 61(1), 234-247.

Rose-Wiles, L. & Hofmann, M. (2013). Still Desperately Seeking Citations: Undergraduate Research in the Age of Web-Scale Discovery. Journal of Library Administration, 53 (2/3), 147-166.

Spiteri, L. (2012). Social Discovery Systems in Public Libraries: If We Build Them, Will They Come? Library Trends, 61(1), 132-147.

Tarulli, L. & Spiteri, L. F. (2012). Library Catalogues of the Future: A Social Space and Collaborative Tool? Library Trends 61(1), 107-131.

Thompson, J. (2014). Implementing Web-Scale Discovery Services: a Practical Guide for LibrariansLanham : Rowman & Littlefield. 

Thompson, J. L., Obrig, K. S., & Abate, L. E. (2013). Web-Scale Discovery in an Academic Health Sciences Library: Development and Implementation of the EBSCO Discovery Service. Medical Reference Services Quarterly32(1), 26-41. doi:10.1080/02763869.2013.749111 - See more at: http://connect.ala.org/node/202483#sthash.qLqGbfw2.dpuf

Thomsett-Scott, B., & Reese, P. E. (2012). Academic Libraries and Discovery Tools: A Survey of the Literature. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(2-4), 123-143

Trott, B., & Tarulli, L. (2011). Readers' Services and the Library Catalog: Coming of Age Fiction? Or Non-Fiction?. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 51(2), 115-118.

Wang, Y. & Dawes, T. (2012). The Next Generation Integrated Library System: A Promise Fulfilled. Information Technology & Libraries, 31(3), 76-84.

Blogs and Podcasts:

Askey, Dale. Giving Up on Discovery. Taiga Forum: http://taiga-forum.org/giving-up-on-discovery/. Accessed Ocober 31, 2013.

Parry, M. As Researchers Turn to Google, Libraries Navigate the Messy World of Discovery Tools. The Chronicle of Higher Education: http://chronicle.com/article/As-Researchers-Turn-to-Google/146081/. Accessed April 21, 2014.

Weinheimer, James. First Thus: Catalog Matters Podcast no. 18: Problems with Library Catalog: http://blog.jweinheimer.net/2013/02/catalog-matters-podcast-no-18-proble...

Weinheimer, James. First Thus: Cataloging Matters no. 19: Library Catalogs and Information Architecture: http://blog.jweinheimer.net/2013/04/cataloging-matters-no-19-library.html

Books:

Chambers, S. (2013). Catalogue 2.0: The future of the library catalogue. Chicago: Neal-Schuman.

Tarulli, L. (2012). The library catalogue as social space: Promoting patron driven collections, online communities, and enhanced reference and readers' services. Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited.

Reports:

Open Discovery Initiative Working Group. (2014) "Open Discovery Iniative: Promoting Transparency in Discovery." NISO-RP-19-2014. http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/13388/rp-19-2014_ODI.pdf

Catalog Examples:

QR Codes: http://infokat.uky.edu/QRinfo.html

For  discussion/consideration:

Catalog by design: http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2013/02/opinion/aaron-schmidt/catalog-by-de...

OPAC Manifesto: http://www.librarian.net/opac/

More...

Online Doc Proposed charge for committee formed by RSS Discovery & ETS Services for Systems & Discovery

by Cynthia A. Johnson on Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 10:11 am

DRAFT

Discovery Innovations and the Library Experience (DILE)

 

DRAFT

Discovery Innovations and the Library Experience (DILE)

 

To engage librarians from academic, public, and special libraries in conversations about how our users experience their libraries through the prism of discovery. These conversations and explorations will focus on a variety of products, both locally and vendor created, including catalogs, discovery layers, recommender systems, and other technologies that help patrons discover a library’s resources, services, and spaces. Outcomes will include programming and dissemination of information that may be used to assist with evaluating, selecting, developing, implementing, and improving discovery products and services. The committee will consider discovery through the lens of specific user groups, such as underrepresented populations and the broad spectrum of library experiences.

Members of the committee will have the opportunity to develop in-person and virtual programs, build communities of practice, employ social media, and participate in other applicable service activities.

More...

Online Doc Background information about potential merge with ETS Services for Systems & Discovery

by Cynthia A. Johnson on Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 02:31 pm

Background:

In last year's Reference Services Section Review there was a recommendation to explore a possible merge of the Discovery Committee with another Committee, since the focus on discovery layers is similar to other groups' charges. To that end, in 2016/17 the Discovery Services Committee worked with the ETS Services for Systems & Discovery to articulate the positives of merging, and to write a new Charge.

Background:

In last year's Reference Services Section Review there was a recommendation to explore a possible merge of the Discovery Committee with another Committee, since the focus on discovery layers is similar to other groups' charges. To that end, in 2016/17 the Discovery Services Committee worked with the ETS Services for Systems & Discovery to articulate the positives of merging, and to write a new Charge.

Why merge with ETS Services for Systems & Discovery?The RSS Discovery Services Committee hasn’t been very active the last few years.

Also, the charges are similar:

RSS Discovery Services Charge: To focus on the use of catalogs and related emerging technologies in reference services, including: monitoring significant continuities and changes; identifying and examining critical issues; and providing a forum for discussion of innovations. (http://www.ala.org/rusa/contact/rosters/rss/rus-moucat)

 

ETS Services for Systems & Discovery Charge : To create, collect, analyze, evaluate and disseminate information and materials on the development, and implementation of a variety of products, both locally and vendor created; coordinate the concerns of individuals or organizations involved in selecting, acquiring, and evaluating electronic reference products and services; and to gather and share with the library profession information on new technologies and ethical issues relating to such systems and services. These services and products can include provision of electronic reference services; document delivery; expert systems; locally developed databases; public access catalogs; non-bibliographic databases, discovery systems. (http://www.ala.org/rusa/contact/rosters/ets/rus-marprods)

 

 

Positives of a merge:

·       More people within a committee to help accomplish its goals.

·       Reduces competing programming at conferences.

·       Redrafting and combining the committee charges would allow us to think about concrete ways in which we can recruit and retain new members, as well as energize current members.

o   We could build in incentives for people to participate in the new committee that have to do with building their CVs (organizing a program, maintaining a community of practice/discussion lists, editing or blogging, etc.

Has a merge like this happened before? Yes, theVirtual Reference Services Committee is a joint committee that reports to both RSS and ETS.

 

Process:

If both committees agree that merging makes sense, the current chairs of RSS and ETS think it will be a fairly simple process. The newly merged Committee could be in place for the 2017/18 year (e.g. active as of July 1, 2017).

Discovery Services discussed the potential merge in November 2017 on a conference call and the participants agreed that a merge made sense.

Draft of a new charge for the merged group is available at http://connect.ala.org/node/262020

RSS and ETS will discuss the draft after Midwinter.

Cynthia Johnson, co-chair

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More...

Online Doc 2016-2107 Discovery Services Goals UPDATE

by Cynthia A. Johnson on Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 01:00 pm

Goal #1: Explore the pros and cons of merging with RUSA ETS committee(s) that are similar in purpose to the RUSA RSS Discovery Services Committee.

Goal #1: Explore the pros and cons of merging with RUSA ETS committee(s) that are similar in purpose to the RUSA RSS Discovery Services Committee.

On Wednesday, 10/26, the following had a conference call to discuss merging these two groups: Cynthia Johnson, Co-chair of Discovery Services; Lily Todorinova, Chair of Services for Systems and Discovery Committee; Amy Rustic, RSS Chair, Courtney Green McDonald, ETS Chair

The participants reviewed the pros of merging and discussed logistics. The committee chair will discuss with their committees before 12/9/2016. By 12/9/2016 we will inform Amy Rustic and Courtney Green McDonald if our groups are or are not in favor of a merge.

A Doodle poll to the RSS Discovery Services Committee has been sent to the Committee to identify a time to discuss a potential merge.

Goal #2:Determine if this Committee should continue to update the Catalog Use Bibliography (http://connect.ala.org/node/202483)

To be discussed at the virtual Midwinter meeting, scheduled for January 10, 2017.

Goal #3: Determine if we will hold an annual discussion forum at ALA Annual, and, if so, plan for the discussion forum.

To be discussed at the virtual Midwinter meeting, scheduled for January 10, 2017.

More...

Online Doc 2016-2107 Discovery Services Goals

by Cynthia A. Johnson on Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:52 pm

Goal #1: Explore the pros and cons of merging with RUSA ETS committee(s) that are similar in purpose to the RUSA RSS Discovery Services Committee.

Goal #2:Determine if this Committee should continue to update the Catalog Use Bibliography (http://connect.ala.org/node/202483)

Goal #3: Determine if we will hold an annual discussion forum at ALA Annual, and, if so, plan for the discussion forum.

Online Doc Roster

by Colleen Seale on Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 03:08 pm

Colleen Seale

Chair, 2012-2013

1-Jul-12

30-Jun-14

ROTATING OFF 2014

         

Prof. Charles William Gee

Member  

Colleen Seale

Chair, 2012-2013

1-Jul-12

30-Jun-14

ROTATING OFF 2014

         

Prof. Charles William Gee

Member  

1-Jul-12

30-Jun-14

ROTATING OFF 2014

Michell J. Hackwelder

Member

1-Jul-12

30-Jun-14

ELIGIBLE FOR REAPPOINTMENT, 2014

Anne Marie Larrivee

Member

1-Jul-12

30-Jun-14

ELIGIBLE FOR REAPPOINTMENT, 2014

Alexander Justice

Member

1-Jul-12

30-Jun-14

ELIGIBLE FOR REAPPOINTMENT, 2014

Tiffany Anderson Hebb

Member

1-Jul-13

30-Jun-15

ELIGIBLE FOR REAPPOINTMENT, 2015

 

More...

Online Doc Minutes Landing Page

by Colleen Seale on Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:41 pm

Use this as a landing page for uploading minutes.  Simply click on the Edit tab, then scroll down to Add File Attachments (below).  We will collect minutes here.

Online Doc Minutes from the Feb 4, 2011 virtual meeting

by Steve Ostrem on Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 03:51 pm

Online Doc Minutes from Annual 2010 (two meetings)

by Steve Ostrem on Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 03:21 pm

Our Mission
To focus on the use of catalogs and related emerging technologies in reference services, including: monitoring significant continuities and changes; identifying and examining critical issues; and providing a forum for discussion of innovation.

Five things you should know about the Catalog Use Committee
Consistent with its charge, the Catalog Use Committee:

  • Examines issues related to discovery and access in the library catalog (broadly defined).
  • Explores emerging technologies within the context of reference services, tracking those trends most likely to be adapted by libraries and be of benefit to users, such as mobile access.
  • Is concerned with maintaining the integrity of library catalogs for users in light of rapid changes in technology, promoting ease of use during transition, and assessing the gains and losses change brings.
  • Promotes the critical appraisal of library technology (what works, what doesn't), and the responsibility reference staff have in teaching the public how to use library systems.
  • Provides and supports opportunities to showcase innovations. The committee develops programs and discussions on these issues, and co-sponsors events developed by other ALA groups.

 

Subscribe to RUSA RSS Discovery Services Committee (Reference Services Section)