Go to:
Discussion
Online Doc
File
Poll
Event
Meeting Request
Suggestion
Allison Payne-IL (staff)'s picture

Pre-vote discussion: Proposed name change of the Value of Academic Libraries Committee

The Board is invited to review the Board action regarding the proposed name change of the Value of Academic Libraries Committee, and have discussion during the period of 10/30/17 to 11/5/17.

Please review the attached Board action form regarding the proposed name change of the Value of Academic Libraries Committee and provide feedback using threaded discussions in this ALA Connect post.

Following the discussion period, the Board will vote on the appointment via virtual vote during 11/6/17 to 11/12/17, and confirm its vote at the 2018 Midwinter Meeting.

Irene Herold's picture

Understanding that VAL has considered this thoughtfully and had discussion(s) with the Board, I just wonder if consulting a bit more broadly would not be in order, since the premise is that this would have a positive effect (switching from value to impact).  Perhaps even a random sample of leaders from COP  would provide the reassurance that their intended outcome is what others not as deeply immersed would also perceive.

Irene Herold

ACRL Board, Past President 2017-2018

Caroline Fuchs's picture

I'm leaning in agreement with Irene on this idea of gathering some more input might be beneficial. Unintended outcomes can have a significant effect.

Prof. Caroline Fuchs
Learning Design Librarian
St. John's University
8000 Utopia Parkway
Queens, NY 11439
Emily Daly's picture

This is an interesting thought, Irene, and I'm eager to hear others' reactions to consulting more broadly. 

As VAL's board liaison, I want to note that VAL members have spent a decent amount of time discussing a possible name change, both in a virtual meeting and in email following their meeting.  There are a number of members who have expressed concerns with the group spending a lot time and energy on a name change, when they really want to be able to build on the good work of the committee.  So, if the Board feels it necessary or useful to poll others about a name change, I'd recommend that we support VAL in doing this (i.e., take the lead on consulting with COP leaders or others), and give VAL members time to work on travel scholarships, research grants, and other key projects they've identified for the fall.  Of course, VAL members might opt to consult with others themselves, but I think we should at least offer to help them if we ask them to seek input from a broader group. 

Again, I think your idea is an interesting one, Irene - thanks for suggesting it!

Emily

Emily Daly
Head, Assessment & User Experience Department
Librarian for Education
Duke University, Perkins Library
Box 90175
Durham, NC 27708-0175
919.660.5879 (ph) 919.660.5957 (fax)

Lauren Pressley's picture

I want to second this approach. I think it's important to get feedback, as this change might be one that is significant to some members, but I'd hate to put it as a burden on the committee. If we can help support gathering this feedback it will save the committee time and also signal to members we're being member-centered.

laurenpressley.com

Jeanne Davidson's picture

I agree that taking the pulse outside the committee and the Board would be a good step.  A quick poll of the COP leadership would be helpful and it wouldn't slow down the process of renaming too much.  Members recognize VAL, so we want to make sure we don't lose that recognition in a name change.

If we suggest the committee get feedback from the COP leadership, can we conduct another Board virtual vote prior to Midwinter?

Jeanne

 

LeRoy LaFleur's picture

Just adding my agreement that, it can't hurt to get some additional input on this idea/name change to a) at least, make the membership aware that the discussion is taking place, and b) get feedback from stakeholders.  I think the ideas behind the name change are on point in the sense that refreshing the brand with a more forward looking statement could have a positive "impact".  That said, I might also add that there may be a more of a middle path, by which the committee is renamed, but we continue to use VAL moniker with reference to the initiative/work for some purposes.   

Cheryl Middleton's picture

I agree with the direction that this conversation is taking regarding a quick survey of the COP community.  Speaking for my own opinion, I am torn about a new name for this committee since VAL is such a recognizable brand for this goal area and the work the committee is engaged in. However, I am flexible and can support a board decision.

Kim Leeder Reed's picture

I appreciate the Board's sensitivity to gathering member input in so many circumstances, but I just don't personally see the need here. Their reasoning makes sense to me. If the committee overall feels a name change makes sense, I support it.

 

Mary Ellen K. Davis (staff)'s picture

Dear Board members,

Looking over your comments, many of you wish for more input from the membership before acting on this request. Here is one possible path forward. You do not have to take action upon this request. We can let the committee know that you would like more information about how a change would resonate in the field.

One possible way to gather more input without burdening the committee would be to put this out as a topic for discussion at the Midwinter Leadership Council. We could also develop a short feedback form that could be send to those leaders not attending MW. I am open to other paths forward but wanted to suggest one possibility.

 

Mary Ellen

Jeanne Davidson's picture

Building on Mary Ellen’s suggestion, how about developing the short feedback form and sending it to the ACRLleads list for a week or so?  That way the VAL committee wouldn’t have to wait until After Midwinter in February.

Jeanne


On No

Lauren Pressley's picture

I like that this takes into account the interest in feedback but doesn't delay the decision too much. If we don't feel February is too far away, Midwinter also works. 

laurenpressley.com

Irene Herold's picture

I support Mary Ellen's summary, and Jeanne's suggestion.

Irene Herold

ACRL Board, Past President 2017-2018